IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i18p7659-d414532.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reversibility and Durability as Potential Indicators for Circular Building Technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Ernesto Antonini

    (Department of Architecture, University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy)

  • Andrea Boeri

    (Department of Architecture, University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy)

  • Massimo Lauria

    (Department of Architecture and Territory dArTe, Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy)

  • Francesca Giglio

    (Department of Architecture and Territory dArTe, Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy)

Abstract

According to the Circularity Gap Report 2020, a mere 8.6% of the global economy was circular in 2019. The Global Status Report 2018 declares that building construction and operations accounted for 36% of global final energy use and 39% of energy–related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. The Paris Agreement demands that the building and construction sector decarbonizes globally by 2050. This requires strategies that minimize the environmental impact of buildings and practices extending the lifecycle of their constituents within a circular resource flow. To ensure that eective measures are applied, a suitable method is needed to assess compliance in materials, processes, and design strategies within circular economy principles. The study’s assumption is that synthetic and reliable indicators for that purpose could be based on reversibility and durability features. The paper provides an overview of building design issues within the circular economy perspective, highlighting the diculty in finding circular technologies which are suitable to enhance buildings’ service life while closing material loops. The results identify reversibility and durability as potential indicators for assessing circular building technologies. The next research stage aims to further develop the rating of circularity requirements for both building technologies and entire buildings.

Suggested Citation

  • Ernesto Antonini & Andrea Boeri & Massimo Lauria & Francesca Giglio, 2020. "Reversibility and Durability as Potential Indicators for Circular Building Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7659-:d:414532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7659/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7659/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oecd, 2020. "Improving resource efficiency and the circularity of economies for a greener world," OECD Environment Policy Papers 20, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pilar Mercader-Moyano & Paula M. Esquivias, 2020. "Decarbonization and Circular Economy in the Sustainable Development and Renovation of Buildings and Neighbourhoods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-6, September.
    2. Héctor Hernández & Felipe Ossio & Michael Silva, 2023. "Assessment of Sustainability and Efficiency Metrics in Modern Methods of Construction: A Case Study Using a Life Cycle Assessment Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-25, April.
    3. Lingaitienė Olga & Burinskienė Aurelija, 2023. "Formation the links between circularity and sustainability in the circular economy," Logistics, Supply Chain, Sustainability and Global Challenges, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Nuo Zhang & Qi Han & Bauke de Vries, 2021. "Building Circularity Assessment in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction Industry: A New Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Cyrine Mrad & Luís Frölén Ribeiro, 2022. "A Review of Europe’s Circular Economy in the Building Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Vanessa Gomes & Maristela Gomes da Silva & Doris Catharine Cornelie Knatz Kowaltowski, 2022. "Long-Term Experience of Teaching Life Cycle Assessment and Circular Design to Future Architects: A Learning by Doing Approach in a Design Studio Setting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-29, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jack Barrie & Patrick Schröder, 2022. "Circular Economy and International Trade: a Systematic Literature Review," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    2. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Jurgita Antucheviciene & M. Reza Hosseini & Igor Martek, 2021. "Sustainable Construction Engineering and Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-8, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7659-:d:414532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.