IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i2p470-d198506.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Substrate on Movement Patterns and Behavior of Stream Fish through Culverts: An Experimental Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Kyla Johnson

    (Department of Biology, 4102 LSB, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA)

  • Lindsay E. Wait

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA)

  • Suzanne K. Monk

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA)

  • Russell Rader

    (Department of Biology, 4102 LSB, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA)

  • Rollin H. Hotchkiss

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA)

  • Mark C. Belk

    (Department of Biology, 4102 LSB, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA)

Abstract

Culverts can provide a significant barrier to fish passage by fragmenting fish habitats and impeding the passage success of small-bodied fish. Geographical connectivity is critical to the maintenance of diverse fish assemblages. Culverts with high cross-sectional velocity can cause population fragmentation by impeding passage of small, freshwater fish. Behavioral responses of small fish to high velocities can differ among functional groups, and swimming behavior of many species is not well known. We tested effects of substrate type on swimming behavior in two small, freshwater fish species—southern leatherside chub ( Lepidomeda aliciae , a midwater species), and longnose dace ( Rhinichthys cataractae , a benthic species)—across three substrate treatments: (1) a bare flume, (2) large flow obstacles, and (3) a natural cobble substrate. Both longnose dace and southern leatherside chub used paths of low velocity and swam in the near-substrate boundary area. Fish in the bare flume and large obstacle treatments swam along the corners of the flume in a straight swim path, whereas fish in the natural substrate treatment used all parts of the flume bed. There was no relationship between passage success of fish and substrate type, fish species, or their interaction. In contrast, substrate type, fish species, and their interaction were significant predictors of passage time. Southern leatherside chub passed through the test section about two to four times faster than longnose dace. Both species took longer to pass through the large flow obstacle treatment compared to the bare flume or natural substrate. The natural substrate created a complex velocity profile with areas of low velocity throughout the entire flume, in contrast to the other two treatments. Our data suggest natural substrates can improve the passage of small fish in high-velocity culverts for both benthic and midwater functional groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyla Johnson & Lindsay E. Wait & Suzanne K. Monk & Russell Rader & Rollin H. Hotchkiss & Mark C. Belk, 2019. "Effects of Substrate on Movement Patterns and Behavior of Stream Fish through Culverts: An Experimental Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:470-:d:198506
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/2/470/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/2/470/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stefan Stoll & Jochem Kail & Armin W Lorenz & Andrea Sundermann & Peter Haase, 2014. "The Importance of the Regional Species Pool, Ecological Species Traits and Local Habitat Conditions for the Colonization of Restored River Reaches by Fish," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:470-:d:198506. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.