IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i24p7116-d297022.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Investigation of the Effect of Recycled Fine Aggregate from New and Old Construction Wastes in C-25 Concrete in Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Lucy Feleke Nigussie

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Jimma University Institute of Technology, Box 378 Jimma, Ethiopia)

  • Muge Mukaddes Darwish

    (Department of Civil, Environmental, and Construction Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX Box 41023, USA)

  • Tewodros Ghebrab

    (Department of Civil, Environmental, and Construction Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX Box 41023, USA)

Abstract

Wherever there are construction activities, there is waste generation. In Ethiopia, the popular material for wall construction is a hollow concrete block that can be broken on the production site or the construction site during loading and unloading and is also found abundantly in demolished buildings. This research aimed at searching for alternative construction materials through recycling and examined the properties of recycled fine aggregate from demolished (old) and construction (new) hollow concrete block (HCB) wastes. The study examined the effect of the recycled HCB on fresh and hardened C-25 concrete properties and the possible replacement percentage of river sand by those recycled fine aggregates. The research also examined the comparative properties of the two recycled fine aggregates. The replacement percentage was in steps of 25%, starting from 25% up to 100%, and 0% represented the reference mix. In general, the recycled fine aggregate exhibited relatively lower physical properties than natural river sand but satisfied the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard requirements. The demolished recycled fine aggregate (DRFA) had slightly lower physical properties than the construction recycled fine aggregate (CRFA). The properties of fresh and hardened concrete were decreased as percentage replacement of DRFA and CRFA increased. The optimum percentage replacement of river sand by recycled fine aggregate was between 50% to 75% but was much closer to 75% for that of recycled from construction (new) and closer to 50% for that of recycled from demolished (old) HCB. Recycling wastes can reduce environmental impact due to sand mining and waste disposal as well as partially conserve the natural resource depletion.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucy Feleke Nigussie & Muge Mukaddes Darwish & Tewodros Ghebrab, 2019. "Comparative Investigation of the Effect of Recycled Fine Aggregate from New and Old Construction Wastes in C-25 Concrete in Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:7116-:d:297022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7116/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7116/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:7116-:d:297022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.