IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i14p3857-d248668.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Etch Characteristics and Morphology of Al 2 O 3 /TiO 2 Stacks for Silicon Surface Passivation

Author

Listed:
  • Dongchul Suh

    (Division of Chemical Engineering, Hoseo University, Asan 31499, Korea)

Abstract

Chemical processes are very important for the development of high-efficiency crystalline solar cells, mainly for surface texturing to improve light absorption and cleaning processes to reduce surface recombination. Recently, research has been focusing on the impact of chemical polishing on the performance of a passivated emitter and rear cells (PERC), with particular emphasis on the dielectric passivation layers on the front side. This study examined the influence of etching on the passivation of Al 2 O 3 /TiO 2 stacks, where the films may each be deposited using a range of deposition and post-annealing parameters. Most TiO 2 films deposited at 300 °C were resistant to chemical etching, and higher temperature deposition and annealing produced more chemical-resistant films. TiO 2 films deposited at 100 °C were etched slightly by SC1 and SC2 solutions at room temperature, whereas they were etched at a relatively high rate in an HF solution, even when capped with a thick TiO 2 layer (up to 50 nm in thickness); blistering occurred in 20-nm-thick Al 2 O 3 films. In contrast to the as-deposited films, the annealed films showed a lower level of passivation as 1% HF etching proceeded. The implied open circuit voltage of the samples annealed at 300 °C after HF etching decreased more than those annealed at 400 °C. The dark area in the photoluminescence images was not resistant to the HF solution and showed more etch pits. The etching strategies developed in this study are expected to help setup integration processes and increase the applicability of this stack to solar cells.

Suggested Citation

  • Dongchul Suh, 2019. "Etch Characteristics and Morphology of Al 2 O 3 /TiO 2 Stacks for Silicon Surface Passivation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:14:p:3857-:d:248668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/14/3857/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/14/3857/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:14:p:3857-:d:248668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.