IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i12p3326-d240349.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison between Daytime and Nighttime Scenery Focusing on Restorative and Recovery Effect

Author

Listed:
  • SangHyun Cheon

    (Department of Urban Planning and Design, Hongik University, Seoul 04066, Korea)

  • Soyoung Han

    (Landscape Architecture Program, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA)

  • Mintai Kim

    (Landscape Architecture Program, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA)

  • Yoonku Kwon

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Korea National College of Agriculture and Fisheries, Jeonju 54874, Korea)

Abstract

The overall purpose of this study was to investigate psycho-physiological variations in human bodies by observing visual images of daytime and nighttime scenery to focus on restorative and recovery effects. Unlike previous studies that have focused on the natural versus built environments, this study aims to compare restorative and recovery potentials between daytime and nighttime. The experiment was conducted by showing a total of 12 images to 60 participants in order to measure the brain response with an electroencephalogram (EEG). As measures of the psychological impact of the images, perceived restorative and recovery scales were used. The self-reported data indicates that daytime sceneries are rated more positively than nighttime sceneries in terms of restorative and recovery effects. According to the EEG results, restorative and recovery feelings have negative relationships with the relative theta band, while positive relationships are shown with the relative alpha band. The correlation analysis between EEG bands and brain regions showed a significant correlation ( p < 0.05) with 46 pairs for the daytime scenery stimuli and 52 pairs for the nighttime scenery stimuli. Through the results of the study, we conclude that daytime and nighttime scenery affect restorative feelings and the human brain response through both verbal and non-verbal methods.

Suggested Citation

  • SangHyun Cheon & Soyoung Han & Mintai Kim & Yoonku Kwon, 2019. "Comparison between Daytime and Nighttime Scenery Focusing on Restorative and Recovery Effect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:12:p:3326-:d:240349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/12/3326/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/12/3326/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mintai Kim & SangHyun Cheon & Youngeun Kang, 2019. "Use of Electroencephalography (EEG) for the Analysis of Emotional Perception and Fear to Nightscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junfang Xie & Binyi Liu & Mohamed Elsadek, 2021. "How Can Flowers and Their Colors Promote Individuals’ Physiological and Psychological States during the COVID-19 Lockdown?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Zijiao Zhang & Kangfu Zhuo & Wenhan Wei & Fu Li & Jie Yin & Liyan Xu, 2021. "Emotional Responses to the Visual Patterns of Urban Streets: Evidence from Physiological and Subjective Indicators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Schwanen, Tim, 2020. "Towards decolonial human subjects in research on transport," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    4. Yuting Wang & Shujian Wang & Ming Xu, 2021. "The Function of Color and Structure Based on EEG Features in Landscape Recognition," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-14, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:12:p:3326-:d:240349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.