IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i4p1206-d141391.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying Effective Fugitive Dust Control Measures for Construction Projects in Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Hyun-jun Noh

    (Department of Architecture Engineering, Kwangwoon University, Seoul 01897, Korea)

  • Seul-ki Lee

    (Institute of Construction and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea)

  • Jung-ho Yu

    (Department of Architecture Engineering, Kwangwoon University, Seoul 01897, Korea)

Abstract

In recent years, the awareness of the seriousness of the damage caused by fugitive dust and the need to manage it have increased. In particular, construction sites comprise 84% of business places that have reported fugitive dust generation, and they are required to have inspection and management to prevent the occurrence of fugitive dust at construction sites. However, the number of complaints in the construction industry due to fugitive dust has increased. The reason for this increase is the fact that existing control measures are defined based on emission processes rather than construction work types, which makes it difficult to apply fugitive dust control measures to construction sites. Therefore, this research evaluated the effectiveness of fugitive dust control measures for construction sites in Korea through a Delphi study. This Delphi study was conducted in two rounds with 12 experts in an on-site panel, and the factors that were determined to be effective control measures were convergence, the content validity ratio (CVR), and stability. This study’s results will be utilized to direct the establishment of future guidelines for fugitive dust control measures based on types of construction work.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyun-jun Noh & Seul-ki Lee & Jung-ho Yu, 2018. "Identifying Effective Fugitive Dust Control Measures for Construction Projects in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:4:p:1206-:d:141391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/1206/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/1206/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lucy Semerjian & Kunle Okaiyeto & Mike O. Ojemaye & Temitope Cyrus Ekundayo & Aboi Igwaran & Anthony I. Okoh, 2021. "Global Systematic Mapping of Road Dust Research from 1906 to 2020: Research Gaps and Future Direction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Muhammad Khan & Numan Khan & Miroslaw J. Skibniewski & Chansik Park, 2021. "Environmental Particulate Matter (PM) Exposure Assessment of Construction Activities Using Low-Cost PM Sensor and Latin Hypercubic Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Hyunsik Kim & Sungho Tae & Jihwan Yang, 2020. "Calculation Methods of Emission Factors and Emissions of Fugitive Particulate Matter in South Korean Construction Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-13, November.
    4. Mekhala Kaluarachchi & Anuradha Waidyasekara & Raufdeen Rameezdeen & Nicholas Chileshe, 2021. "Mitigating Dust Pollution from Construction Activities: A Behavioural Control Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Jinding Xing & Kunhui Ye & Jian Zuo & Weiyan Jiang, 2018. "Control Dust Pollution on Construction Sites: What Governments Do in China?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Puthearath Chan & Myeong-Hun Lee, 2019. "Developing Sustainable City Indicators for Cambodia through Delphi Processes of Panel Surveys," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-32, June.
    7. Victoria Austin & Kate Mattick & Cathy Holloway, 2021. "“This Is the Story of Community Leadership with Political Backing. (PM1)” Critical Junctures in Paralympic Legacy: Framing the London 2012 Disability Inclusion Model for New Global Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-25, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:4:p:1206-:d:141391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.