IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i11p4083-d181168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross-Cultural Analysis of Young Drivers’ Preferences for In-Vehicle Systems and Behavioral Effects Caused by Secondary Tasks

Author

Listed:
  • Chenggang Li

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Wuhong Wang

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Hongwei Guo

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China)

  • André Dietrich

    (Chair of Ergonomics, Technical University of Munich, 85748 Munich, Germany)

Abstract

Hundreds of new features and functionalities have been introduced as in-vehicle systems (IVS) mature. However, it remains unclear whether these novel designs have appropriately addressed driver preferences and requirements, especially when factors such as geographical or cultural differences are considered. An empirical study was conducted to determine cultural differences between young Chinese and German drivers with respect to (a) preferences for 18 selected IVS and (b) behavioral effects in six secondary driving tasks. Data from 232 Chinese and 94 German drivers were collected through an online questionnaire and the results indicate that young Chinese drivers value most of the selected IVS designs more significantly than the Germans do, except in categories such as radio, navigation and autonomous emergency braking. In addition, rotary with a display screen is the most preferred interaction modality for both groups. As for behavioral effects when performing secondary tasks, young Chinese drivers are more likely to engage in safety-related scenarios while the Germans in efficiency-related scenarios. An ordinal logistic regression analysis suggested a strong correlation between secondary tasks (looking up navigation, dialing the phone and connecting Bluetooth) and behavioral degradation for young Chinese drivers, whereas the six secondary tasks seem to affect German drivers minimally. Based on the preference analysis and attitudes to behavioral impacts, implications for the design of IVS are discussed to better satisfy needs from drivers of different cultural backgrounds.

Suggested Citation

  • Chenggang Li & Wuhong Wang & Hongwei Guo & André Dietrich, 2018. "Cross-Cultural Analysis of Young Drivers’ Preferences for In-Vehicle Systems and Behavioral Effects Caused by Secondary Tasks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:4083-:d:181168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/4083/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/4083/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:4083-:d:181168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.