IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i10p3603-d174561.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Sampling Point Discretization on the Regional Variability of Soil Organic Carbon in the Red Soil Region, China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhongqi Zhang

    (School of Geography, Geomatics, and Planning, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China
    State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China)

  • Yiquan Sun

    (School of Geography, Geomatics, and Planning, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Dongsheng Yu

    (State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China
    Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China)

  • Peng Mao

    (School of Geography, Geomatics, and Planning, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Li Xu

    (School of Geography, Geomatics, and Planning, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China)

Abstract

Research on the regional variability of soil organic carbon (SOC) has focused mostly on the influence of the number of soil sampling points and interpolation methods. Little attention has typically been paid to the influence of sampling point discretization. Based on dense soil sampling points in the red soil area of Southern China, we obtained four sample discretization levels by a resampling operation. Then, regional SOC distributions were obtained at four levels by two interpolation methods: ordinary Kriging (OK) and Kriging combined with land use information (LuK). To evaluate the influence of sample discretization on revealing SOC variability, we compared the interpolation accuracies at four discretization levels with uniformly distributed validation points. The results demonstrated that the spatial distribution patterns of SOC were roughly similar, but the contour details in some local areas were different at the various discretization levels. Moreover, the predicted mean absolute errors (MAE) and root mean square errors (RMSE) of the two Kriging methods all rose with an increase in discretization. From the lowest to the largest discretization level, the MAEs of OK and LuK rose from 4.47 and 3.02 g kg −1 to 5.46 and 3.54 g kg −1 , and the RMSEs rose from 5.13 and 3.95 g kg −1 to 5.76 and 4.76 g kg −1 , respectively. Though the trend of prediction errors varied with discretization levels, the interpolation accuracies of the two Kriging methods were both influenced by the sample discretization level. Furthermore, the spatial interpolation uncertainty of OK was more sensitive to the discretization level than that of the LuK method. Therefore, when the spatial distribution of SOC is predicted using Kriging methods based on the same sample quantity, the more uniformly distributed sampling points are, the more accurate the spatial prediction accuracy of SOC will be, and vice versa. The results of this study can act as a useful reference for evaluating the uncertainty of SOC spatial interpolation and making a soil sampling scheme in the red soil region of China.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhongqi Zhang & Yiquan Sun & Dongsheng Yu & Peng Mao & Li Xu, 2018. "Influence of Sampling Point Discretization on the Regional Variability of Soil Organic Carbon in the Red Soil Region, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:10:p:3603-:d:174561
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3603/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3603/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhongqi Zhang & Dongsheng Yu & Xiyang Wang & Yue Pan & Guangxing Zhang & Xuezheng Shi, 2018. "Influence of the Selection of Interpolation Method on Revealing Soil Organic Carbon Variability in the Red Soil Region, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-12, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sunwei Wei & Zhengyong Zhao & Qi Yang & Xiaogang Ding, 2021. "A Two-Stage Approach to the Estimation of High-Resolution Soil Organic Carbon Storage with Good Extension Capability," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Mateusz Ciski & Krzysztof Rząsa & Marek Ogryzek, 2019. "Use of GIS Tools in Sustainable Heritage Management—The Importance of Data Generalization in Spatial Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-21, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junjun Fang & Xiaomei Li & Jinming Sha & Taifeng Dong & Jiali Shang & Eshetu Shifaw & Yung-Chih Su & Jinliang Wang, 2023. "Regional-Scale Topsoil Organic Matter Estimation Based on a Geographic Detector Model Using Landsat Data, Pingtan Island, Fujian, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Yang Liu & Xiaoyu Liu & Yanfang Feng & Dongsheng Yu & Xuezheng Shi, 2018. "Composition of a Soil Organic Carbon Increment under Different Vegetable Cultivation Patterns: A Study Using Three SOC Pools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:10:p:3603-:d:174561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.