IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jstats/v9y2026i3p63-d1970736.html

Discrimination of Geological Orientation Data with Measurement Errors

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Di Marzio

    (Department of Socio-Economic, Managerial and Statistical Studies (DISEGS), University of Chieti-Pescara, Viale Pindaro 42, 65129 Pescara, Italy)

  • Stefania Fensore

    (Department of Socio-Economic, Managerial and Statistical Studies (DISEGS), University of Chieti-Pescara, Viale Pindaro 42, 65129 Pescara, Italy)

  • Agnese Panzera

    (Department of Statistics, Computer Science, Applications (DiSIA), University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 59, 50134 Florence, Italy)

  • Chiara Passamonti

    (Department of Mathematics, University of Luxembourg, Belval Campus, Maison du Nombre 6, Avenue de la Fonte, L-4364 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg)

Abstract

Fracture orientation data in structural geology are commonly affected by non-negligible angular uncertainty, which can significantly impact the reliability of classification and interpretation of deformation patterns. In this work, we address the problem of discriminating between two groups of directional observations. To account for measurement uncertainty inherent in field data, we adopt a deconvolution-based circular kernel discriminant rule specifically designed for noisy angular observations. This approach explicitly incorporates the measurement-error mechanism into the estimation process, allowing for more robust classification in the presence of observational noise. The methodology is applied to measurements arising in structural geology, where the discrimination of fracture orientations is relevant to the interpretation of deformation patterns and to applications in rock engineering. Specifically, we consider two datasets from Ordovician turbidites, involving different types of orientation data. The first dataset consists of L 0 1 axes, representing linear features described by Plunge–Azimuth coordinates, while the second dataset concerns axial-plane cleavage surfaces, expressed in terms of Dip and Dip direction. We assess the performance of the estimator under varying levels of angular uncertainty and alternative error distributions, with a focus on its ability to correctly separate the two geological groups. Results show that explicitly modeling measurement error leads to improved discrimination accuracy and more reliable identification of structural patterns compared to standard methods that neglect noise.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Di Marzio & Stefania Fensore & Agnese Panzera & Chiara Passamonti, 2026. "Discrimination of Geological Orientation Data with Measurement Errors," Stats, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:9:y:2026:i:3:p:63-:d:1970736
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/9/3/63/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/9/3/63/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:9:y:2026:i:3:p:63-:d:1970736. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.