Author
Listed:
- Nubaira Rizvi
(Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, School of Public Health, LSU-Health New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA)
- Amjila Bam
(Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, School of Public Health, LSU-Health New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA)
- Wentao Cao
(Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA)
- Qingzhao Yu
(Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, School of Public Health, LSU-Health New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA)
Abstract
Mediation analysis is a widely used statistical technique for identifying the mechanisms underlying the relationship between an exposure and an outcome. However, accurate power analysis and sample size determination for mediation models that involve non-normal distributions or mixtures of continuous and binary variables are challenging. We propose a computationally efficient simulation-based approach for general mediation analysis. By applying monotone smoothing splines to estimate empirical critical values derived from extensive simulations, our method enables accurate power calculations without the need for real-time simulation. We validated the method across varying scenarios, including continuous, binary variables and time-to-event outcome with strict Type I error control. The method-quantified large effects (0.35) yielded >80% power at minimal sample sizes ( n = 25–50) across all settings, while small effects (0.02) required larger samples. Continuous models achieved 80% power for small effects at n = 410, whereas fully binary models required n > 500. For medium effects (0.15), the power was >0.80 at n = 75 with binary mediators. This study presents a robust framework that combines the flexibility of simulation-based inference with the speed of analytical approximations. We provide an accompanying R package to facilitate efficient sample size planning for mediation models.
Suggested Citation
Nubaira Rizvi & Amjila Bam & Wentao Cao & Qingzhao Yu, 2026.
"Sample Size Calculation and Power Analysis for the General Mediation Analysis Method,"
Stats, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jstats:v:9:y:2026:i:1:p:19-:d:1865206
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:9:y:2026:i:1:p:19-:d:1865206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.