IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jstats/v8y2025i4p105-d1786641.html

Silhouette-Based Evaluation of PCA, Isomap, and t-SNE on Linear and Nonlinear Data Structures

Author

Listed:
  • Mostafa Zahed

    (Department of Mathematics & Statistics, East Tennessee State University (ETSU), Johnson City, TN 37614, USA)

  • Maryam Skafyan

    (Department of Mathematics & Statistics, East Tennessee State University (ETSU), Johnson City, TN 37614, USA)

Abstract

Dimensionality reduction is fundamental for analyzing high-dimensional data, supporting visualization, denoising, and structure discovery. We present a systematic, large-scale benchmark of three widely used methods—Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Isometric Mapping (Isomap), and t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE)—evaluated by average silhouette scores to quantify cluster preservation after embedding. Our full factorial simulation varies sample size n ∈ { 100 , 200 , 300 , 400 , 500 } , noise variance σ 2 ∈ { 0.25 , 0.5 , 0.75 , 1 , 1.5 , 2 } , and feature count p ∈ { 20 , 50 , 100 , 200 , 300 , 400 } under four generative regimes: (1) a linear Gaussian mixture, (2) a linear Student- t mixture with heavy tails, (3) a nonlinear Swiss-roll manifold, and (4) a nonlinear concentric-spheres manifold, each replicated 1000 times per condition. Beyond empirical comparisons, we provide mathematical results that explain the observed rankings: under standard separation and sampling assumptions, PCA maximizes silhouettes for linear, low-rank structure, whereas Isomap dominates on smooth curved manifolds; t-SNE prioritizes local neighborhoods, yielding strong local separation but less reliable global geometry. Empirically, PCA consistently achieves the highest silhouettes for linear structure (Isomap second, t-SNE third); on manifolds the ordering reverses (Isomap > t-SNE > PCA). Increasing σ 2 and adding uninformative dimensions (larger p ) degrade all methods, while larger n improves levels and stability. To our knowledge, this is the first integrated study combining a comprehensive factorial simulation across linear and nonlinear regimes with distribution-based summaries (density and violin plots) and supporting theory that predicts method orderings. The results offer clear, practice-oriented guidance: prefer PCA when structure is approximately linear; favor manifold learning—especially Isomap—when curvature is present; and use t-SNE for the exploratory visualization of local neighborhoods. Complete tables and replication materials are provided to facilitate method selection and reproducibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Mostafa Zahed & Maryam Skafyan, 2025. "Silhouette-Based Evaluation of PCA, Isomap, and t-SNE on Linear and Nonlinear Data Structures," Stats, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-52, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:8:y:2025:i:4:p:105-:d:1786641
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/8/4/105/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/8/4/105/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:8:y:2025:i:4:p:105-:d:1786641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.