IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jstats/v4y2021i1p4-61d479590.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Quantitative Approach to Evaluate the Application of the Extended Situational Teaching Model in Engineering Education

Author

Listed:
  • Fariborz M. Tehrani

    (Department of Civil and Geomatics Engineering, Lyles College of Engineering, California State University, Fresno, CA 93740, USA)

  • Christopher McComb

    (School of Engineering Design, Technology and Professional Programs, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA)

  • Sherrianna Scott

    (Department of Liberal Studies, Kremen School of Education and Human Development, California State University, Fresno, CA 93740, USA)

Abstract

The extended situational teaching model is a variation of situational teaching, which itself has roots in situational leadership. Application of situational leadership in education requires the teacher to lead students through various stages of the learning process. This paper presents the relationship between performance measures of extended situational teaching and common pedagogical tools in engineering classrooms. These relationships outlined the response of students at different preparation levels to the application of various course components, including classroom activities and out-of-classroom assignments, in respect to task and relationship behaviors. The results of a quantitative survey are presented to support the existence of such a relationship and to demonstrate the effectiveness of the extended situational teaching model. The survey covered 476 engineering students enrolled in nine different courses over a four-year period within the civil engineering program. The statistical analysis of the survey responses proceeded in two stages. The first stage of the analysis evaluates whether the survey tool can resolve meaningful differences between the categories of the situational teaching model, and provides aggregate recommendations for each category. In the second stage of the analysis, the specific instantiation of these categories is broken down according to academic standing (grade point average) and academic level, offering support for an extended situational teaching model. Conclusions discuss the statistical characteristics of the results and correlations between selected pedagogical tools and performance measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Fariborz M. Tehrani & Christopher McComb & Sherrianna Scott, 2021. "A Quantitative Approach to Evaluate the Application of the Extended Situational Teaching Model in Engineering Education," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:4:y:2021:i:1:p:4-61:d:479590
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/4/1/4/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/4/1/4/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:4:y:2021:i:1:p:4-61:d:479590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.