IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v5y2017i2p25-d95758.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Singapore’s Pension Scheme: A Blueprint for Further Flexibility

Author

Listed:
  • Koon-Shing Kwong

    (School of Economics, Singapore Management University, Singapore 178903, Singapore)

  • Yiu-Kuen Tse

    (School of Economics, Singapore Management University, Singapore 178903, Singapore)

  • Wai-Sum Chan

    (Department of Finance, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong)

Abstract

Building a social security system to ensure Singapore residents have peace of mind in funding for retirement has been at the top of Singapore government’s policy agenda over the last decade. Implementation of the Lifelong Income For the Elderly (LIFE) scheme in 2009 clearly shows that the government spares no effort in improving its pension scheme to boost its residents’ income after retirement. Despite the recent modifications to the LIFE scheme, Singapore residents must still choose between two plans: the Standard and Basic plans. To enhance the flexibility of the LIFE scheme with further streamlining of its fund management, we propose some plan modifications such that scheme members do not face a dichotomy of plan choices. Instead, they select two age parameters: the Payout Age and the Life-annuity Age . This paper discusses the actuarial analysis for determining members’ payouts and bequests based on the proposed age parameters. We analyze the net cash receipts and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) for various plan-parameter configurations. This information helps members make their plan choices. To address cost-of-living increases we propose to extend the plan to accommodate an annual step-up of monthly payouts. By deferring the Payout Age from 65 to 68, members can enjoy an annual increase of about 2% of the payouts for the same first-year monthly benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Koon-Shing Kwong & Yiu-Kuen Tse & Wai-Sum Chan, 2017. "Enhancing Singapore’s Pension Scheme: A Blueprint for Further Flexibility," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-17, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:5:y:2017:i:2:p:25-:d:95758
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/5/2/25/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/5/2/25/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:5:y:2017:i:2:p:25-:d:95758. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.