IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v14y2026i8p186-d2020689.html

Analysis of the Mitigating Effect of Financial Regulatory Penalties on Bank Systemic Risk

Author

Listed:
  • Wenlong Miao

    (International Business School, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China)

  • Siyu Zhang

    (International Business School, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China)

  • Yuanyuan Huo

    (International Business School, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China)

Abstract

Financial regulatory penalties are a critical tool for curbing bank violations and play an important role in safeguarding the banking system against systemic risk. This study examines the effects of regulatory penalties imposed by the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) and the National Financial Regulatory Administration (NFRA) on bank systemic risk. We construct a unique dataset of 10,462 penalty decisions manually collected from 2014 to 2023, and employ a two-way fixed effects model to identify the impact of regulatory penalties. The results show that financial regulatory penalties exert a significant mitigating effect on bank systemic risk. This effect operates through two primary channels: first, by reducing the idiosyncratic risk of individual banks; and second, by weakening the intensity of risk transmission across institutions. The risk-controlling effect is further amplified under higher regulatory pressure and stronger creditor oversight. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that the penalty effect varies by penalty type, bank level, and regulatory authority, and is more pronounced for monetary fines, penalties imposed on provincial and municipal branches, and enforcement actions conducted by the NFRA. Notably, when banking institutions and the broader banking system are already in an extreme risk state, financial regulatory penalties may cease to serve as an effective tool for containing systemic risk and preserving financial stability. Our findings suggest that strengthening the enforcement and coordination of macroprudential and microprudential supervision, along with reinforcing market discipline, can enhance the effectiveness of financial penalties in safeguarding financial stability.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenlong Miao & Siyu Zhang & Yuanyuan Huo, 2026. "Analysis of the Mitigating Effect of Financial Regulatory Penalties on Bank Systemic Risk," Risks, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-29, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:14:y:2026:i:8:p:186-:d:2020689
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/14/8/186/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/14/8/186/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:14:y:2026:i:8:p:186-:d:2020689. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.