IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v13y2025i10p195-d1764792.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The BTC Price Prediction Paradox Through Methodological Pluralism

Author

Listed:
  • Mariya Paskaleva

    (Department of Finance and Accounting, South-West University “Neofit Rilski”, 2700 Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria)

  • Ivanka Vasenska

    (Department of Tourism, South-West University “Neofit Rilski”, 2700 Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria)

Abstract

Bitcoin’s extreme price volatility presents significant challenges for investors and traders, necessitating accurate predictive models to guide decision-making in cryptocurrency markets. This study compares the performance of machine learning approaches for Bitcoin price prediction, specifically examining XGBoost gradient boosting, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and GARCH-DL neural networks using comprehensive market data spanning December 2013 to May 2025. We employed extensive feature engineering incorporating technical indicators, applied multiple machine and deep learning models configurations including standalone and ensemble approaches, and utilized cross-validation techniques to assess model robustness. Based on the empirical results, the most significant practical implication is that traders and financial institutions should adopt a dual-model approach, deploying XGBoost for directional trading strategies and utilizing LSTM models for applications requiring precise magnitude predictions, due to their superior continuous forecasting performance. This research demonstrates that traditional technical indicators, particularly market capitalization and price extremes, remain highly predictive in algorithmic trading contexts, validating their continued integration into modern cryptocurrency prediction systems. For risk management applications, the attention-based LSTM’s superior risk-adjusted returns, combined with enhanced interpretability, make it particularly valuable for institutional portfolio optimization and regulatory compliance requirements. The findings suggest that ensemble methods offer balanced performance across multiple evaluation criteria, providing a robust foundation for production trading systems where consistent performance is more valuable than optimization for single metrics. These results enable practitioners to make evidence-based decisions about model selection based on their specific trading objectives, whether focused on directional accuracy for signal generation or precision of magnitude for risk assessment and portfolio management.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariya Paskaleva & Ivanka Vasenska, 2025. "The BTC Price Prediction Paradox Through Methodological Pluralism," Risks, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-43, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:13:y:2025:i:10:p:195-:d:1764792
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/13/10/195/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/13/10/195/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:13:y:2025:i:10:p:195-:d:1764792. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.