IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v12y2024i2p25-d1329844.html

A Generalized Linear Model and Machine Learning Approach for Predicting the Frequency and Severity of Cargo Insurance in Thailand’s Border Trade Context

Author

Listed:
  • Praiya Panjee

    (School of Engineering, University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce, Bangkok 10400, Thailand)

  • Sataporn Amornsawadwatana

    (School of Engineering, University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce, Bangkok 10400, Thailand)

Abstract

The study compares model approaches in predictive modeling for claim frequency and severity within the cross-border cargo insurance domain. The aim is to identify the optimal model approach between generalized linear models (GLMs) and advanced machine learning techniques. Evaluations focus on mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean squared error (RMSE) metrics to comprehensively assess predictive performance. For frequency prediction, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) demonstrates the lowest MAE, indicating higher accuracy compared to gradient boosting machines (GBMs) and a generalized linear model (Poisson). Despite XGBoost’s lower MAE, it shows higher RMSE values, suggesting a broader error spread and larger magnitudes compared to gradient boosting machines (GBMs) and a generalized linear model (Poisson). Conversely, the generalized linear model (Poisson) showcases the best RMSE values, indicating tighter clustering and smaller error magnitudes, despite a slightly higher MAE. For severity prediction, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) displays the lowest MAE, implying better accuracy. However, it exhibits a higher RMSE, indicating wider error dispersion compared to a generalized linear model (Gamma). In contrast, a generalized linear model (Gamma) demonstrates the lowest RMSE, portraying tighter clustering and smaller error magnitudes despite a higher MAE. In conclusion, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) stands out in mean absolute error (MAE) for both frequency and severity prediction, showcasing superior accuracy. However, a generalized linear model (Gamma) offers a balance between accuracy and error magnitude, and its performance outperforms extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and gradient boosting machines (GBMs) in terms of RMSE metrics, with a slightly higher MAE. These findings empower insurance companies to enhance risk assessment processes, set suitable premiums, manage reserves, and accurately forecast claim occurrences, contributing to competitive pricing for clients while ensuring profitability. For cross-border trade entities, such as trucking companies and cargo owners, these insights aid in improved risk management and potential cost savings by enabling more reasonable insurance premiums based on accurate predictive claims from insurance companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Praiya Panjee & Sataporn Amornsawadwatana, 2024. "A Generalized Linear Model and Machine Learning Approach for Predicting the Frequency and Severity of Cargo Insurance in Thailand’s Border Trade Context," Risks, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-33, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:12:y:2024:i:2:p:25-:d:1329844
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/12/2/25/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/12/2/25/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carina Clemente & Gracinda R. Guerreiro & Jorge M. Bravo, 2023. "Modelling Motor Insurance Claim Frequency and Severity Using Gradient Boosting," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nezir Köse & Yunus Emre Gür & Emre Ünal, 2025. "Deep Learning and Machine Learning Insights Into the Global Economic Drivers of the Bitcoin Price," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(5), pages 1666-1698, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Hitchen & Saralees Nadarajah, 2025. "Implementing Custom Loss Functions in Advanced Machine Learning Structures for Targeted Outcomes," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Gadir Alomair, 2024. "Predictive performance of count regression models versus machine learning techniques: A comparative analysis using an automobile insurance claims frequency dataset," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Esmeralda Brati & Alma Braimllari & Ardit Gjeçi, 2025. "Machine Learning Applications for Predicting High-Cost Claims Using Insurance Data," Data, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Muhammad Adeel Abid, 2026. "A Unified Multi-Model Learning Framework for Reliable Static Malware Detection," International Journal of Innovations in Science & Technology, 50sea, vol. 8(3), pages 87-99, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:12:y:2024:i:2:p:25-:d:1329844. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.