IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v9y2020i2p13-d312842.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pipeline Neighbors: How Can We Avoid Conflicts?

Author

Listed:
  • Natalya Novikova

    (The Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Pr., 32A, 119991 Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

In this article, I consider the various policies of oil and gas companies relating to Indigenous peoples of the Russian Federation. The analysis is based on field research in Northern Russian regions. Data for the analysis comprises: International standards, Russian laws, corporate codes, official regulations, and interviews with company employees and representatives of the Indigenous populations. The research methodology is based on the concept of legal pluralism as the coexistence of various legal regimes and the search for platforms of common interests. The goal of this article is to analyze policies on benefit sharing by assessing projects and programs adopted by various industrial companies according to the social and humanitarian prospects of their social acceptance. I consider the possibilities for Russian legislation to promote respecting Indigenous people’s interests in the preparation of corporate sustainability reports.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalya Novikova, 2020. "Pipeline Neighbors: How Can We Avoid Conflicts?," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:13-:d:312842
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/9/2/13/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/9/2/13/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Svetlana Tulaeva & Maria Tysiachniouk, 2017. "Benefit-Sharing Arrangements between Oil Companies and Indigenous People in Russian Northern Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-21, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Victor Pavlov & Victor Cesar Martins de Aguiar & Lars Robert Hole & Eva Pongrácz, 2021. "A 30-Year Probability Map for Oil Spill Trajectories in the Barents Sea to Assess Potential Environmental and Socio-Economic Threats," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anatolii Sleptsov & Aitalina Petrova, 2019. "Ethnological Expertise in Yakutia: The Local Experience of Assessing the Impact of Industrial Activities on the Northern Indigenous Peoples," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Svetlana Tulaeva & Soili Nysten-Haarala, 2019. "Resource Allocation in Oil-Dependent Communities: Oil Rent and Benefit Sharing Arrangements," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Vera Kuklina & Andrey N Petrov & Natalia Krasnoshtanova & Viktor Bogdanov, 2020. "Mobilizing Benefit-Sharing Through Transportation Infrastructure: Informal Roads, Extractive Industries and Benefit-Sharing in the Irkutsk Oil and Gas Region, Russia," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Maria Tysiachniouk & Andrey N. Petrov & Vera Kuklina & Natalia Krasnoshtanova, 2018. "Between Soviet Legacy and Corporate Social Responsibility: Emerging Benefit Sharing Frameworks in the Irkutsk Oil Region, Russia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, September.
    5. Andrey N. Petrov & Maria S. Tysiachniouk, 2019. "Benefit Sharing in the Arctic: A Systematic View," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-16, September.
    6. Svetlana A. Tulaeva & Maria S. Tysiachniouk & Laura A. Henry & Leah S. Horowitz, 2019. "Globalizing Extraction and Indigenous Rights in the Russian Arctic: The Enduring Role of the State in Natural Resource Governance," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Ekaterina Britcyna, 2019. "Industrial Projects and Benefit-Sharing Arrangements in the Russian North. Is Contracting Possible?," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-14, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:13-:d:312842. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.