IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v12y2023i7p81-d1190413.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improvement of MBBR Performance by the Addition of 3D-Printed Biocarriers Fabricated with 13X and Bentonite

Author

Listed:
  • Dimitra C. Banti

    (QLAB Private Company, Research & Development, Quality Control and Testing Services, 57008 Thessaloniki, Greece
    Department of Food Science and Technology, School of Geotechnical Sciences, International Hellenic University, 57400 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Petros Samaras

    (Department of Food Science and Technology, School of Geotechnical Sciences, International Hellenic University, 57400 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Afroditi G. Chioti

    (QLAB Private Company, Research & Development, Quality Control and Testing Services, 57008 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Anastasios Mitsopoulos

    (QLAB Private Company, Research & Development, Quality Control and Testing Services, 57008 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Michail Tsangas

    (Laboratory of Chemical Engineering and Engineering Sustainability, Faculty of Pure and Applied Sciences, Environmental Conservation and Management, Open University of Cyprus, Latsia, P.O. Box 12794, Nicosia 2252, Cyprus)

  • Antonis Zorpas

    (Laboratory of Chemical Engineering and Engineering Sustainability, Faculty of Pure and Applied Sciences, Environmental Conservation and Management, Open University of Cyprus, Latsia, P.O. Box 12794, Nicosia 2252, Cyprus)

  • Themistoklis Sfetsas

    (QLAB Private Company, Research & Development, Quality Control and Testing Services, 57008 Thessaloniki, Greece)

Abstract

The current study investigated the performance of a moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR), when adding 3D-printed biocarriers fabricated with 13X and bentonite (MBBR 3D), when using K1 commercial biocarriers (MBBR K1) and when not adding biocarriers at all (control MBBR). For the evaluation of the MBBR efficiency, various physicochemical parameters were measured, while biofilm extracted from the biocarriers was evaluated. The findings suggest that there is an optimal biodegradation of the organic load in all MBBR units. The nitrification and denitrification processes were improved in MBBR 3D as compared to the control MBBR and MBBR K1. The dry mass of the biofilm in the 3D-printed biocarriers was two orders of magnitude larger than in the K1 biocarriers. Moreover, in the K1 biocarriers the mass of the biofilm varied in relation to time, since it could not be protected inside the holes, something that did not happen with the 3D-printed biocarriers. Finally, it was found, mostly in MBBR 3D and less in MBBR K1, that the growth of nitrifying bacteria and heterotrophs inside the units increased the biomass production in the form of soluble microbial products, which in turn favored the adhesion of biomass on the surface of biocarriers.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimitra C. Banti & Petros Samaras & Afroditi G. Chioti & Anastasios Mitsopoulos & Michail Tsangas & Antonis Zorpas & Themistoklis Sfetsas, 2023. "Improvement of MBBR Performance by the Addition of 3D-Printed Biocarriers Fabricated with 13X and Bentonite," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:12:y:2023:i:7:p:81-:d:1190413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/12/7/81/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/12/7/81/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Serena Conserva & Fabio Tatti & Vincenzo Torretta & Navarro Ferronato & Paolo Viotti, 2019. "An Integrated Approach to the Biological Reactor–Sedimentation Tank System," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-19, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:12:y:2023:i:7:p:81-:d:1190413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.