IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jpubli/v2y2014i2p44-50d34561.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Demographics of Deception: What Motivates Authors Who Engage in Misconduct?

Author

Listed:
  • R. Grant Steen

    (Medical Communications Consultants LLC, 103 Van Doren Place, Chapel Hill, NC 27517, USA)

Abstract

We hypothesized that scientific misconduct (data fabrication or falsification) is goal-directed behavior. This hypothesis predicts that papers retracted for misconduct: are targeted to journals with a high impact factor (IF); are written by authors with additional papers withdrawn for misconduct; diffuse responsibility across many (perhaps innocent) co-authors; and are retracted slower than papers retracted for other infractions. These hypotheses were initially tested and confirmed in a database of 788 papers; here we reevaluate these hypotheses in a larger database of 2,047 English-language papers. Journal IF was higher for papers retracted for misconduct ( p < 0.0001). Roughly 57% of papers retracted for misconduct were written by a first author with other retracted papers; 21% of erroneous papers were written by authors with >1 retraction ( p < 0.0001). Papers flawed by misconduct diffuse responsibility across more authors ( p < 0.0001) and are withdrawn more slowly ( p < 0.0001) than papers retracted for other reasons. Papers retracted for unknown reasons are unlike papers retracted for misconduct: they are generally published in journals with low IF; by authors with no other retractions; have fewer authors listed; and are retracted quickly. Papers retracted for unknown reasons appear not to represent a deliberate effort to deceive.

Suggested Citation

  • R. Grant Steen, 2014. "The Demographics of Deception: What Motivates Authors Who Engage in Misconduct?," Publications, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-7, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:2:y:2014:i:2:p:44-50:d:34561
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/2/2/44/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/2/2/44/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:2:y:2014:i:2:p:44-50:d:34561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.