IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jpubli/v14y2026i2p24-d1920869.html

The Coverage of Non-Traditional Research Outputs in Repositories and Current Research Information Systems: An Exploratory Study at the University of Bologna

Author

Listed:
  • Alberto Ciarrocca

    (Department of Classical Philology and Italian Studies, University of Bologna, Via Zamboni 32, 40126 Bologna (BO), Italy)

  • Ivan Heibi

    (Department of Classical Philology and Italian Studies, University of Bologna, Via Zamboni 32, 40126 Bologna (BO), Italy)

  • Ahmadreza Nazari

    (Department of Classical Philology and Italian Studies, University of Bologna, Via Zamboni 32, 40126 Bologna (BO), Italy)

  • Anna Nicoletti

    (Department of Classical Philology and Italian Studies, University of Bologna, Via Zamboni 32, 40126 Bologna (BO), Italy)

  • Martina Pensalfini

    (Department of Classical Philology and Italian Studies, University of Bologna, Via Zamboni 32, 40126 Bologna (BO), Italy)

  • Silvio Peroni

    (Department of Classical Philology and Italian Studies, University of Bologna, Via Zamboni 32, 40126 Bologna (BO), Italy)

  • Lucrezia Pograri

    (Department of Classical Philology and Italian Studies, University of Bologna, Via Zamboni 32, 40126 Bologna (BO), Italy)

  • Pietro Tisci

    (Department of Classical Philology and Italian Studies, University of Bologna, Via Zamboni 32, 40126 Bologna (BO), Italy)

  • Sergei Slinkin

    (Department of Classical Philology and Italian Studies, University of Bologna, Via Zamboni 32, 40126 Bologna (BO), Italy)

Abstract

The diversification of research outcomes produced within scholarly communication practices has led to a growing production of non-traditional research outputs (NTROs) such as datasets, software, databases, exhibitions, and multimedia materials, which are often poorly tracked by institutional systems. This study presents an exploratory study about knowledge production at the University of Bologna (UNIBO). This prominent national research institution offers a compelling case study to assess coverage, cross-repository overlap, and citation activity of NTROs across repositories. By harvesting and integrating metadata from the University of Bologna’s institutional CRIS system, the institutional repository AMS Acta, the general-purpose repository Zenodo, the disciplinary archive Software Heritage, and OpenCitations to gather citation information, we analyse the availability of UNIBO-affiliated NTROs and show that, while the UNIBO CRIS platform (i.e., IRIS) remains the primary registry for information on NTROs, a substantial number of them are hosted exclusively in external repositories. These findings highlight structural gaps in tracking NTROs in UNIBO IRIS and underline the need for improved interoperability and coordinated Open Science strategies and policies, at least at the local level, to ensure recognition of diverse research outputs.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberto Ciarrocca & Ivan Heibi & Ahmadreza Nazari & Anna Nicoletti & Martina Pensalfini & Silvio Peroni & Lucrezia Pograri & Pietro Tisci & Sergei Slinkin, 2026. "The Coverage of Non-Traditional Research Outputs in Repositories and Current Research Information Systems: An Exploratory Study at the University of Bologna," Publications, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:14:y:2026:i:2:p:24-:d:1920869
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/14/2/24/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/14/2/24/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:14:y:2026:i:2:p:24-:d:1920869. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.