IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jpubli/v13y2025i4p59-d1797656.html

An Assessment of Scientific Productivity: Review in the Area of Agricultural and Biological Sciences in Ecuador Using Scientometrics and Lotka’s Law

Author

Listed:
  • William Viera-Arroyo

    (Dirección de Investigaciones, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIAP), Av. Eloy Alfaro N30-350 y Amazonas, Quito 170518, Ecuador)

  • Lya Vera

    (Dirección de Investigaciones, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIAP), Av. Eloy Alfaro N30-350 y Amazonas, Quito 170518, Ecuador)

  • Martín Moya

    (Dirección de Investigaciones, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIAP), Av. Eloy Alfaro N30-350 y Amazonas, Quito 170518, Ecuador)

  • Duther López

    (Dirección de Investigaciones, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIAP), Av. Eloy Alfaro N30-350 y Amazonas, Quito 170518, Ecuador)

  • Wilson Vásquez-Castillo

    (Grupo de Investigación en Alimentos y Agroindustria (GIA 2 ), Ingeniería Agroindustrial, Universidad de Las Américas (UDLA), Redondel del Ciclista Vía a Nayón, Quito 170124, Ecuador)

  • Carlos Caicedo

    (Dirección de Investigaciones, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIAP), Av. Eloy Alfaro N30-350 y Amazonas, Quito 170518, Ecuador)

Abstract

Scientific production is a key indicator of a country’s academic and institutional development. This review followed a quantitative and descriptive bibliometric design using Lotka’s Law, aimed at analysing Ecuador’s scientific production in the area of Agricultural and Biological Sciences from 2014 to 2024. The bibliographic data were obtained from the Scopus database, which offers comprehensive coverage of the peer-reviewed literature and standardised metadata. Data (2881 documents) revealed publication patterns, collaboration networks and impact indicators. Lotka’s Law was applied to evaluate and describe author productivity among researchers affiliated with Ecuadorian universities and the Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIAP). The model yielded an average n -parameter of 2.56, indicating a moderate concentration among a small group of researchers. There was a sustained growth in scientific publications, especially after 2018, with a high proportion published in Q1 and Q2 journals. The institutions with the most relevant affiliations included PUCE, UTM, USFQ, INIAP, ESPOL and UDLA, all maintaining consistent contributions to scientific output. The keyword co-occurrence analysis revealed a thematic focus on biodiversity, taxonomy and conservation. The limitations of this study were related to the fact that the analysis was based only on data retrieved from the Scopus database and that the use of Lotka’s Law assumes a theoretical distribution that does not fully account for contextual factors. Overall, Ecuador’s scientific system shows progress in terms of research productivity; however, it requires further development and the strengthening of institutional and human research capacities to generate more equitable scientific production in terms of the number of researchers.

Suggested Citation

  • William Viera-Arroyo & Lya Vera & Martín Moya & Duther López & Wilson Vásquez-Castillo & Carlos Caicedo, 2025. "An Assessment of Scientific Productivity: Review in the Area of Agricultural and Biological Sciences in Ecuador Using Scientometrics and Lotka’s Law," Publications, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:59-:d:1797656
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/13/4/59/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/13/4/59/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:59-:d:1797656. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.