IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jpubli/v13y2025i4p51-d1765172.html

Enhancing Research Visibility: A Comparative Study on the Implementation of CRIS Systems at Universidad Católica de Santa María and Its Contrast with Other Universities

Author

Listed:
  • Javier Fernando Angulo-Osorio

    (Escuela Profesional de Ingeniería de Sistemas, Universidad Católica de Santa María, Arequipa 04000, Peru)

  • César Daniel Valdivia-Portugal

    (Escuela Profesional de Ingeniería Industrial, Universidad Católica de Santa María, Arequipa 04000, Peru)

  • Karina Rosas-Paredes

    (Escuela Profesional de Ingeniería de Sistemas, Universidad Católica de Santa María, Arequipa 04000, Peru)

Abstract

Research visibility has become a critical issue for universities, yet the institutional conditions that shape it remain underexplored. While Current Research Information Systems (CRISs) provide essential infrastructure for managing publications and researcher profiles, their impact depends on broader governance and cultural factors. This study compares four universities—two in Peru, one in Chile, and one in Spain—that have adopted the Pure CRIS platform. Data were manually extracted from institutional portals and analyzed descriptively, using normalized indicators such as publications per researcher, Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) alignment, and collaboration networks. Although based on a limited sample, the analysis highlights substantial contrasts: European institutions show consolidated integration of CRIS into national evaluation systems, while Latin American universities remain at earlier stages of adoption, with fragmented policies and limited international reach. The findings suggest that technological platforms alone are insufficient; institutional commitment, coherent policies, and academic cultures that value dissemination are decisive. These insights contribute a comparative framework to guide universities, particularly in Latin America, seeking to strengthen their global research visibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Javier Fernando Angulo-Osorio & César Daniel Valdivia-Portugal & Karina Rosas-Paredes, 2025. "Enhancing Research Visibility: A Comparative Study on the Implementation of CRIS Systems at Universidad Católica de Santa María and Its Contrast with Other Universities," Publications, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-12, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:51-:d:1765172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/13/4/51/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/13/4/51/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Puyu Yang & Ahad Shoaib & Robert West & Giovanni Colavizza, 2024. "Open access improves the dissemination of science: insights from Wikipedia," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(11), pages 7083-7106, November.
    2. Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo & Flavia Di Costa, 2019. "The collaboration behavior of top scientists," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(1), pages 215-232, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marian-Gabriel Hâncean & Matjaž Perc & Jürgen Lerner, 2021. "The coauthorship networks of the most productive European researchers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(1), pages 201-224, January.
    2. Orhan, Mehmet A. & van Rossenberg, Yvonne & Bal, P. Matthijs, 2024. "Authorship inequality and elite dominance in management and organizational research: A review of six decades," OSF Preprints tzx92, Center for Open Science.
    3. Petr Praus, 2025. "A note on the topic of single-author articles in science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(5), pages 3071-3088, May.
    4. Dewan F. Wahid & Elkafi Hassini, 2022. "A Literature Review on Correlation Clustering: Cross-disciplinary Taxonomy with Bibliometric Analysis," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 1-42, September.
    5. Moxin Li & Yang Wang, 2024. "Influence of political tensions on scientific productivity, citation impact, and knowledge combinations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(4), pages 2337-2370, April.
    6. Kyriakos Drivas & Arsenios-Georgios N. Prelorentzos & Georgios Spais, 2025. "Unbundling science: the impact of the internet on knowledge dissemination and spillovers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(11), pages 6289-6303, November.
    7. Shen, Hongquan & Xie, Juan & Ao, Weiyi & Cheng, Ying, 2022. "The continuity and citation impact of scientific collaboration with different gender composition," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1).
    8. Jesús de Frutos-Belizón & Natalia García-Carbonell, 2026. "Which came first: the chicken or the egg? Analysing the bidirectionality of non-academic collaborations and scientific teams productivity," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 131(1), pages 533-556, January.
    9. Teddy Lazebnik & Ariel Rosenfeld, 2025. "How lonely or influential is the Lone Wolf? An analysis of individual scholars’ solo-authorship dynamics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(5), pages 3053-3069, May.
    10. Samuel-Soma M. Ajibade & Festus Victor Bekun & Festus Fatai Adedoyin & Bright Akwasi Gyamfi & Anthonia Oluwatosin Adediran, 2023. "Machine Learning Applications in Renewable Energy (MLARE) Research: A Publication Trend and Bibliometric Analysis Study (2012–2021)," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-21, April.
    11. Yu-Peng Zhu & Han-Woo Park, 2022. "Use of Triangulation in Comparing the Blockchain Knowledge Structure between China and South Korea: Scientometric Network, Topic Modeling, and Prediction Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Anahita Hajibabaei & Andrea Schiffauerova & Ashkan Ebadi, 2023. "Women and key positions in scientific collaboration networks: analyzing central scientists’ profiles in the artificial intelligence ecosystem through a gender lens," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(2), pages 1219-1240, February.
    13. Yongchao Ma & Ying Teng & Zhongzhun Deng & Li Liu & Yi Zhang, 2023. "Does writing style affect gender differences in the research performance of articles?: An empirical study of BERT-based textual sentiment analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(4), pages 2105-2143, April.
    14. Mehmet A Orhan & Yvonne G T van Rossenberg & P. Matthijs Bal, 2023. "Authorship inequality and elite dominance in management and organizational research: A review of six decades," Post-Print hal-04966164, HAL.
    15. Xie, Qing & Zhang, Xinyuan & Kim, Giyeong & Song, Min, 2022. "Exploring the influence of coauthorship with top scientists on researchers’ affiliation, research topic, productivity, and impact," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3).
    16. Antonio Zinilli & Lorenzo Giammei & Emanuela Varinetti, 2026. "Collaborative structures and research productivity: an empirical analysis with Bayesian networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 131(2), pages 1209-1236, February.
    17. Zhu, Yongjun & Kim, Donghun & Jiang, Ting & Zhao, Yi & He, Jiangen & Chen, Xinyi & Lou, Wen, 2024. "Dependency, reciprocity, and informal mentorship in predicting long-term research collaboration: A co-authorship matrix-based multivariate time series analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1).
    18. repec:osf:osfxxx:tzx92_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Kjersten Bunker Whittington & Molly M. King & Isabella Cingolani, 2024. "Structure, status, and span: gender differences in co-authorship networks across 16 region-subject pairs (2009–2013)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(1), pages 147-179, January.
    20. Min, Ji eun & Kim, Byung-Keun, 2024. "Creativity and collaborative performance of artists and STEM professionals," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    21. Rachida Aïssaoui & J. Michael Geringer & Grigorios Livanis, 2020. "International Collaboration and European Contributions to International Business Research," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 60(6), pages 827-868, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:51-:d:1765172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.