IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jpubli/v13y2025i2p25-d1650381.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research Trends of Vaccination-Related Systematic Reviews, 2011–2023: A Bibliometric Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Antonia Pilic

    (Immunization Unit, Robert Koch Institute, 13353 Berlin, Germany
    Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany)

  • Louise Henaff

    (World Health Organization (WHO), 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland)

  • Christoph A. Steffen

    (World Health Organization (WHO), 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland)

  • Hanna Helene Linß

    (Immunization Unit, Robert Koch Institute, 13353 Berlin, Germany)

  • Antonia Isabelle Dreyer

    (Immunization Unit, Robert Koch Institute, 13353 Berlin, Germany)

  • Madeleine Batke

    (Immunization Unit, Robert Koch Institute, 13353 Berlin, Germany)

  • Ole Wichmann

    (Immunization Unit, Robert Koch Institute, 13353 Berlin, Germany)

  • Vanessa Piechotta

    (Immunization Unit, Robert Koch Institute, 13353 Berlin, Germany)

  • Thomas Harder

    (Immunization Unit, Robert Koch Institute, 13353 Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

Systematic reviews (SRs) reflect the best available evidence for informing vaccination recommendations. This study presents a bibliometric analysis of vaccination-related SRs aiming to uncover research trends. Vaccination-related SRs published from 2011 to 2023 in MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library and the Living Overview of Evidence database were considered. Trends over time, disease/pathogen, topic, population, geographical location, accessibility, methodological quality, and overlap were descriptively analyzed using R. A total of 2275 SRs were identified, most of which were freely accessible (n = 2083, 91.7%). The annual number of published SRs increased more than twelvefold from 2011 to 2023. COVID-19 (n = 861, 37.8%), influenza (n = 328, 14.4%), Human papillomavirus (n = 248, 10.9%), and pneumococcal disease (n = 152, 6.7%) were the most frequently addressed diseases/pathogens. Efficacy/effectiveness (n = 1066, 46.9%) and safety of vaccines (n = 812, 35.7%) were the most common topics. The methodological quality of SRs on intervention topics (n = 1376) was mostly critically low (n = 1155, 84.0%). Several SRs were identified that covered similar diseases/pathogens, topics and populations, indicating duplication and overlap, particularly for COVID-19. Our analysis showed a large increase in the number of published vaccination-related SRs. The results provide a basis for understanding the current state and priorities in vaccination research and decrease the overlap potential in newly developed SRs.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonia Pilic & Louise Henaff & Christoph A. Steffen & Hanna Helene Linß & Antonia Isabelle Dreyer & Madeleine Batke & Ole Wichmann & Vanessa Piechotta & Thomas Harder, 2025. "Research Trends of Vaccination-Related Systematic Reviews, 2011–2023: A Bibliometric Analysis," Publications, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:25-:d:1650381
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/13/2/25/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/13/2/25/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:25-:d:1650381. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.