IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2021i15p1746-d600606.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Size Effects in Finite Element Modelling of 3D Printed Bone Scaffolds Using Hydroxyapatite PEOT/PBT Composites

Author

Listed:
  • Iñigo Calderon-Uriszar-Aldaca

    (TECNALIA, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Mikeletegi Pasealekua 2, 20009 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
    Department of Engineering, Public University of Navarra, 31006 Pamplona, Spain)

  • Sergio Perez

    (TECNALIA, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Mikeletegi Pasealekua 2, 20009 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain)

  • Ravi Sinha

    (Complex Tissue Regeneration Department, MERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, University of Maastricht, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands)

  • Maria Camara-Torres

    (Complex Tissue Regeneration Department, MERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, University of Maastricht, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands)

  • Sara Villanueva

    (TECNALIA, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Mikeletegi Pasealekua 2, 20009 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain)

  • Carlos Mota

    (Complex Tissue Regeneration Department, MERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, University of Maastricht, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands)

  • Alessandro Patelli

    (Department of Physics and Astronomy, Padova University, Via Marzolo 8, 35131 Padova, Italy)

  • Amaia Matanza

    (Materials Physics Center (MPC), Centro de Fisica de Materiales (CSIC, UPV/EHU), Paseo Manuel de Lardizabal 5, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain)

  • Lorenzo Moroni

    (Complex Tissue Regeneration Department, MERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, University of Maastricht, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands)

  • Alberto Sanchez

    (TECNALIA, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Mikeletegi Pasealekua 2, 20009 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain)

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) of scaffolds enables the fabrication of customized patient-specific implants for tissue regeneration. Scaffold customization does not involve only the macroscale shape of the final implant, but also their microscopic pore geometry and material properties, which are dependent on optimizable topology. A good match between the experimental data of AM scaffolds and the models is obtained when there is just a few millimetres at least in one direction. Here, we describe a methodology to perform finite element modelling on AM scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration with clinically relevant dimensions (i.e., volume > 1 cm 3 ). The simulation used an equivalent cubic eight node finite elements mesh, and the materials properties were derived both empirically and numerically, from bulk material direct testing and simulated tests on scaffolds. The experimental validation was performed using poly(ethylene oxide terephthalate)-poly(butylene terephthalate) (PEOT/PBT) copolymers and 45 wt% nano hydroxyapatite fillers composites. By applying this methodology on three separate scaffold architectures with volumes larger than 1 cm 3 , the simulations overestimated the scaffold performance, resulting in 150–290% stiffer than average values obtained in the validation tests. The results mismatch highlighted the relevance of the lack of printing accuracy that is characteristic of the additive manufacturing process. Accordingly, a sensitivity analysis was performed on nine detected uncertainty sources, studying their influence. After the definition of acceptable execution tolerances and reliability levels, a design factor was defined to calibrate the methodology under expectable and conservative scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Iñigo Calderon-Uriszar-Aldaca & Sergio Perez & Ravi Sinha & Maria Camara-Torres & Sara Villanueva & Carlos Mota & Alessandro Patelli & Amaia Matanza & Lorenzo Moroni & Alberto Sanchez, 2021. "Size Effects in Finite Element Modelling of 3D Printed Bone Scaffolds Using Hydroxyapatite PEOT/PBT Composites," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(15), pages 1-37, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:15:p:1746-:d:600606
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/15/1746/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/15/1746/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:15:p:1746-:d:600606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.