IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v8y2020i10p1673-d422380.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rapid Consensus Structure: Continuous Common Knowledge in Asynchronous Distributed Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Sang-Min Choi

    (Department of Computer Science, Yonsei University, 03722 Seoul, Korea
    Research Team, The Level Inc., 06141 Seoul, Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jiho Park

    (Department of Computer Science, Yonsei University, 03722 Seoul, Korea
    CTO, LG CNS, 07796 Seoul, Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Kiyoung Jang

    (Department of Computer Science, Yonsei University, 03722 Seoul, Korea)

  • Chihyun Park

    (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Kangwon National University, 24341 Gangwon-do, Korea)

Abstract

A distributed system guarantees the acceptance of Byzantine fault tolerance (BFT) for information transmission. Practical BFT (pBFT) and asynchronous BFT (aBFT) are among the various available forms of BFT. Distributed systems generally share information with all participating nodes. After information is shared, the systems reshare it. Thus, ensuring BFT consumes a considerable amount of time. Herein, we propose Decision search protocols that apply the gossip protocol, denoted by DecisionBFT, for distributed networks with guaranteed BFT. Each protocol in DecisionBFT is completely asynchronous and leaderless; it has an eventual consensus but no round-robin or proof-of-work. The core concept of the proposed technology is the consensus structure, which is based on the directed acyclic graph (DAG) and gossip protocol. In the most general form, each node in the algorithm has a set of k neighbors of most preference. When receiving transactions, a node creates and connects an event block with all its neighbors. Each event block is signed by the hashes of the creating node and its k peers. The consensus structure of the event blocks utilizes a DAG, which guarantees aBFT. The proposed framework uses Lamport timestamps and concurrent common knowledge. Further, an example of a Decision search algorithm, based on the gossip protocol DecisionBFT, is presented. The proposed DecisionBFT protocol can reach a consensus when 2/3 of all participants agree to an event block without any additional communication overhead. The DecisionBFT protocol relies on a cost function to identify the k peers and generate the DAG-based consensus structure. By creating a dynamic flag table that stores connection information between blocks, the gossip protocol achieves a consensus in fewer steps than that in the case of the existing aBFT protocol.

Suggested Citation

  • Sang-Min Choi & Jiho Park & Kiyoung Jang & Chihyun Park, 2020. "Rapid Consensus Structure: Continuous Common Knowledge in Asynchronous Distributed Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-38, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:10:p:1673-:d:422380
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/10/1673/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/10/1673/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:10:p:1673-:d:422380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.