IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v7y2019i7p628-d248531.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cantor Paradoxes, Possible Worlds and Set Theory

Author

Listed:
  • José-Luis Usó-Doménech

    (Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain)

  • Josué-Antonio Nescolarde-Selva

    (Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain)

  • Lorena Segura-Abad

    (Department of Mathematics, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain)

  • Hugh Gash

    (Institute of Education, Dublin City University, D09 Y18 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Kristian Alonso-Stenberg

    (Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain)

Abstract

In this paper, we illustrate the paradox concerning maximally consistent sets of propositions, which is contrary to set theory. It has been shown that Cantor paradoxes do not offer particular advantages for any modal theories. The paradox is therefore not a specific difficulty for modal concepts, and it also neither grants advantages nor disadvantages for any modal theory. The underlying problem is quite general, and affects anyone who intends to use the notion of “world” in its ontology.

Suggested Citation

  • José-Luis Usó-Doménech & Josué-Antonio Nescolarde-Selva & Lorena Segura-Abad & Hugh Gash & Kristian Alonso-Stenberg, 2019. "Cantor Paradoxes, Possible Worlds and Set Theory," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-10, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:7:y:2019:i:7:p:628-:d:248531
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/7/7/628/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/7/7/628/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:7:y:2019:i:7:p:628-:d:248531. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.