IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v6y2018i11p250-d182308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Generalized Framework for Analyzing Taxonomic, Phylogenetic, and Functional Community Structure Based on Presence–Absence Data

Author

Listed:
  • János Podani

    (Department of Plant Systematics, Ecology and Theoretical Biology, Institute of Biology, Eötvös University, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary
    MTA-ELTE-MTM Ecology Research Group, Eötvös University, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Sandrine Pavoine

    (Centre d'Ecologie et des Sciences de la Conservation (CESCO), Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, 75005 Paris, France)

  • Carlo Ricotta

    (Department of Environmental Biology, University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’, 00185 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Community structure as summarized by presence–absence data is often evaluated via diversity measures by incorporating taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional information on the constituting species. Most commonly, various dissimilarity coefficients are used to express these aspects simultaneously such that the results are not comparable due to the lack of common conceptual basis behind index definitions. A new framework is needed which allows such comparisons, thus facilitating evaluation of the importance of the three sources of extra information in relation to conventional species-based representations. We define taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional beta diversity of species assemblages based on the generalized Jaccard dissimilarity index. This coefficient does not give equal weight to species, because traditional site dissimilarities are lowered by taking into account the taxonomic, phylogenetic or functional similarity of differential species in one site to the species in the other. These, together with the traditional, taxon- (species-) based beta diversity are decomposed into two additive fractions, one due to taxonomic, phylogenetic or functional excess and the other to replacement. In addition to numerical results, taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional community structure is visualized by 2D simplex or ternary plots. Redundancy with respect to taxon-based structure is expressed in terms of centroid distances between point clouds in these diagrams. The approach is illustrated by examples coming from vegetation surveys representing different ecological conditions. We found that beta diversity decreases in the following order: taxon-based, taxonomic (Linnaean), phylogenetic and functional. Therefore, we put forward the beta-redundancy hypothesis suggesting that this ordering may be most often the case in ecological communities, and discuss potential reasons and possible exceptions to this supposed rule. Whereas the pattern of change in diversity may be indicative of fundamental features of the particular community being studied, the effect of the choice of functional traits—a more or less subjective element of the framework—remains to be investigated.

Suggested Citation

  • János Podani & Sandrine Pavoine & Carlo Ricotta, 2018. "A Generalized Framework for Analyzing Taxonomic, Phylogenetic, and Functional Community Structure Based on Presence–Absence Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:6:y:2018:i:11:p:250-:d:182308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/6/11/250/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/6/11/250/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:6:y:2018:i:11:p:250-:d:182308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.