Author
Listed:
- Sherif I. Ammar
(Faculty of Education and Arts, Sohar University, Sohar 3111, Oman
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Menofia University, Shibin El Kom 32511, Egypt)
- Faizah T. Alamri
(Mathematics Department, College of Science, Taibah University, Madinah 41411, Saudi Arabia)
- Faiza A. Althubyani
(Mathematics Department, College of Science, Taibah University, Madinah 41411, Saudi Arabia)
- Mahmoud H. Abu-Moussa
(Faculty of Education and Arts, Sohar University, Sohar 3111, Oman
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt)
Abstract
Reliability studies frequently employ progressive censoring schemes that remove surviving units during testing, yet statistical inference under such designs remains vulnerable to parametric model misspecification. When distributional assumptions fail, conventional maximum likelihood estimators converge to systematically biased limits, producing confidence intervals with severely degraded coverage. We develop a flexible inferential framework that models the hazard function through a neural network architecture, avoiding commitment to a parametric family. To quantify uncertainty, we introduce a stratified weighted bootstrap procedure that preserves the dependency structure induced by progressive removals. We establish that the proposed estimator achieves the minimax optimal nonparametric rate n − α / ( 2 α + 1 ) for α -smooth hazard functions and prove that the bootstrap consistently approximates the sampling distribution, yielding asymptotically valid pointwise confidence intervals for the survival function. A local asymptotic analysis precisely characterizes the efficiency–robustness tradeoff. Comprehensive simulations comparing against parametric methods, penalized splines, piecewise exponential models, and kernel estimators demonstrate that our method maintains 92–94% coverage under misspecification, whereas parametric alternatives collapse to 40–45% and simpler nonparametric methods achieve only 85–91%. The neural network architecture provides 23–29% lower integrated mean squared error than penalized splines using the same bootstrap, confirming that both components of our framework contribute to performance. Computational requirements remain practical: parallelized bootstrap inference completes in under 25 s on an 8-core processor for typical sample sizes. Application to electronic component lifetime data illustrates how the methodology yields materially different reliability assessments with direct implications for warranty planning.
Suggested Citation
Sherif I. Ammar & Faizah T. Alamri & Faiza A. Althubyani & Mahmoud H. Abu-Moussa, 2026.
"Machine Learning Hazard Estimation with Valid Bootstrap Inference for Generalized Progressive Hybrid Censoring,"
Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-37, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:14:y:2026:i:9:p:1480-:d:1930547
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:14:y:2026:i:9:p:1480-:d:1930547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.