IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i5p887-d1606987.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Analysis of Compression and Transfer Learning Techniques in DeepFake Detection Models

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Karathanasis

    (Information Technologies Institute, Centre for Research & Technology, Hellas, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • John Violos

    (Information Technologies Institute, Centre for Research & Technology, Hellas, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Ioannis Kompatsiaris

    (Information Technologies Institute, Centre for Research & Technology, Hellas, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)

Abstract

DeepFake detection models play a crucial role in ambient intelligence and smart environments, where systems rely on authentic information for accurate decisions. These environments, integrating interconnected IoT devices and AI-driven systems, face significant threats from DeepFakes, potentially leading to compromised trust, erroneous decisions, and security breaches. To mitigate these risks, neural-network-based DeepFake detection models have been developed. However, their substantial computational requirements and long training times hinder deployment on resource-constrained edge devices. This paper investigates compression and transfer learning techniques to reduce the computational demands of training and deploying DeepFake detection models, while preserving performance. Pruning, knowledge distillation, quantization, and adapter modules are explored to enable efficient real-time DeepFake detection. An evaluation was conducted on four benchmark datasets: “SynthBuster”, “140k Real and Fake Faces”, “DeepFake and Real Images”, and “ForenSynths”. It compared compressed models with uncompressed baselines using widely recognized metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, model size, and training time. The results showed that a compressed model at 10% of the original size retained only 56% of the baseline accuracy, but fine-tuning in similar scenarios increased this to nearly 98%. In some cases, the accuracy even surpassed the original’s performance by up to 12%. These findings highlight the feasibility of deploying DeepFake detection models in edge computing scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Karathanasis & John Violos & Ioannis Kompatsiaris, 2025. "A Comparative Analysis of Compression and Transfer Learning Techniques in DeepFake Detection Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-30, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:5:p:887-:d:1606987
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/5/887/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/5/887/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:5:p:887-:d:1606987. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.