Author
Listed:
- Ema Carnia
(Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jatinangor, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)
- Sukono
(Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jatinangor, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)
- Moch Panji Agung Saputra
(Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jatinangor, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)
- Mugi Lestari
(Master Program in Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jatinangor, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)
- Audrey Ariij Sya’imaa HS
(Master Program in Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jatinangor, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)
- Astrid Sulistya Azahra
(Doctoral Program in Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Padjadjaran University, Jatinangor, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)
- Mohd Zaki Awang Chek
(Center for Actuarial Studies, Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Tapah Campus, Tapah Road, Tapah 35400, Perak, Malaysia)
Abstract
Investment decision-making is often characterized by uncertainty and the subjective weighting of criteria. This study aims to develop a more robust decision support framework by integrating the Generalized Interval-Valued Hesitant Intuitionistic Fuzzy Soft Set (GIVHIFSS) with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to objectively weight criteria and handle multi-evaluator hesitancy. In the proposed GIVHIFSS-AHP model, the AHP is employed to derive mathematically consistent criterion weights, which are subsequently embedded into the GIVHIFSS structure to accommodate interval-valued and hesitant evaluations from multiple decision-makers. The model is applied to a numerical case study evaluating five investment alternatives. Its performance is assessed through a comparative analysis with standard GIVHIFSS and GIFSS models, as well as a sensitivity analysis. The results indicate that the model produces financially rational rankings, identifying blue-chip technology stocks as the optimal choice (score: +2.4). The comparative analysis confirms its superiority over existing models, which yielded less-stable rankings. Moreover, the sensitivity analysis demonstrates the robustness of the results against minor perturbations in criterion weights. This research introduces a novel and synergistic integration of the AHP and GIVHIFSS. The key advantage of this approach lies in its ability to address the long-standing issue of arbitrary criterion weighting in Fuzzy Soft Set models by embedding the AHP as a foundational mechanism for ensuring validation and objectivity. This integration results in mathematically derived, consistent weights, thereby yielding empirically validated, more reliable, and defensible decision outcomes compared with existing models.
Suggested Citation
Ema Carnia & Sukono & Moch Panji Agung Saputra & Mugi Lestari & Audrey Ariij Sya’imaa HS & Astrid Sulistya Azahra & Mohd Zaki Awang Chek, 2025.
"Integrated Framework of Generalized Interval-Valued Hesitant Intuitionistic Fuzzy Soft Sets with the AHP for Investment Decision-Making Under Uncertainty,"
Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-30, October.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:19:p:3188-:d:1765160
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:19:p:3188-:d:1765160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.