IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i17p2869-d1742893.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Permutation-Based Analysis of Clinical Variables in Necrotizing Fasciitis Using NPC and Bootstrap

Author

Listed:
  • Gianfranco Piscopo

    (Department of Mathematics and Applications “Renato Caccioppoli”, University of Naples Federico II, 80126 Naples, Italy)

  • Sai Teja Bandaru

    (Department of Mathematics and Physics, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 81100 Caserta, Italy)

  • Massimiliano Giacalone

    (Department of Economics, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 81043 Capua, Italy)

  • Maria Longobardi

    (Department of Mathematics and Applications “Renato Caccioppoli”, University of Naples Federico II, 80126 Naples, Italy)

Abstract

Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a rare but aggressive soft tissue infection with high rates of mortality and amputation, making early identification of key prognostic biomarkers essential for clinical management. However, the rarity and heterogeneity of NF mean clinical datasets are often small and non-normally distributed, limiting the effectiveness of standard parametric statistical approaches. To address this, we retrospectively analyzed 66 NF patients using a robust, distribution-free framework that combines the Nonparametric Combination (NPC) methodology and bootstrap resampling. We specifically assessed glycated hemoglobin (HBA1C) and serum albumin (ALBUMINA) as potential predictors of two outcomes: mortality (MORTO) and major amputation (AMPUTAZIONE). NPC enabled exact multivariate hypothesis testing while rigorously controlling the family-wise error rate (FWER), and bootstrap resampling generated 95% confidence intervals (CI) for critical biomarkers. HBA1C was an exceptionally significant predictor compared to the 7.0% clinical threshold ( p = 1.04 × 10 −154 , CI: 0.0830–0.0957), while ALBUMINA showed greater biological variability but no significant association with outcomes (2.8 g/dL; p = 0.267, CI: 2.551–2.866). We also developed a global severity ranking, integrating multiple variables to improve clinical risk stratification. Our results demonstrate that permutation-based and resampling methods provide reliable, actionable insights from challenging small-sample clinical datasets. Based on a small-sample dataset from necrotizing fasciitis patients, this framework provides a replicable model for robust, nonparametric statistical analysis in similarly rare and high-risk medical conditions. This study introduces a Nonparametric Combination (NPC) framework for risk scoring in necrotizing fasciitis using bootstrap resampling and permutation tests. Key predictors like HBA1C and Albumin were assessed, achieving an AUC of 0.89 and a Youden Index of 0.71. The model offers a robust, interpretable tool for clinical risk stratification in small-sample rare disease settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Gianfranco Piscopo & Sai Teja Bandaru & Massimiliano Giacalone & Maria Longobardi, 2025. "Permutation-Based Analysis of Clinical Variables in Necrotizing Fasciitis Using NPC and Bootstrap," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-23, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:17:p:2869-:d:1742893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/17/2869/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/17/2869/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:17:p:2869-:d:1742893. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.