Author
Listed:
- Ping Song
(School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China)
- Zhisheng Xu
(School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China)
- Zuxian Wang
(School of Civil Engineering, Sun-Yatsen University, Guangzhou 510275, China)
- Yuexiang Lin
(School of Civil Engineering, Sun-Yatsen University, Guangzhou 510275, China)
Abstract
Accidental surface surcharge will generate additional load in the stratum, which then leads to unfavorable impacts on the underlying shield tunnel. This paper proposes a probabilistic analysis method to address this problem. In this framework, an improved soil–tunnel interaction model considering the nonlinearity of the subgrade is established at first, and the Newton–Raphson iterative solution algorithm is employed to acquire tunnel responses. Then, the random field models of the initial stiffness and the ultimate reaction of the subgrade are constructed to realize the spatial variability of soil properties. Finally, with the aid of the Monte Carlo Simulation method, the probabilistic analyses on tunnel responses are performed by combining the improved soil–tunnel interaction model and the random field model of subgrade parameters. The applicability and the superiority of the improved soil–tunnel interaction model are validated by a historical case from Shanghai Metro Line 9. The results prove that the traditional linear foundation model will overestimate the bearing capacity of the subgrade, thereby leading to overly optimistic assessments of surcharge-induced tunnel responses. This shortcoming could be addressed by the improved nonlinear soil–tunnel interaction model. The influences of spatial variability of soil properties on tunnel responses are nonnegligible. The stronger the uncertainties of subgrade parameters, in terms of the initial stiffness and the ultimate reaction concerned in this work, the higher the failure risk of the shield tunnel subjected to the surcharge. The failure modes of the tunnel subjected to the surcharge are controlled by the longitudinal curvature radius of the tunnel within the current assessment criteria, which means if this evaluation indicator can be restricted within the allowable value, then the opening of the circumferential joint and the longitudinal settlement can also meet the requirements. Compared with the influences of the uncertainty of the subgrade ultimate reaction, the spatial variability of the subgrade initial stiffness has greater influences on tunnel failure risk under the same conditions. An increase in the range of surcharge will raise the risk of tunnel failure, while the influence of tunnel burial depth is just the opposite.
Suggested Citation
Ping Song & Zhisheng Xu & Zuxian Wang & Yuexiang Lin, 2025.
"Probabilistic Analysis of Shield Tunnel Responses to Surface Surcharge Considering Subgrade Nonlinearity and Variability,"
Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-24, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:16:p:2620-:d:1725403
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:16:p:2620-:d:1725403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.