IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i16p2605-d1724622.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated Process Planning and Scheduling Framework Using an Optimized Rule-Mining Approach for Smart Manufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Syeda Marzia

    (Production & Operations Management Research Lab, Industrial and Manufacturing System Engineering Department, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada)

  • Ahmed Azab

    (Production & Operations Management Research Lab, Industrial and Manufacturing System Engineering Department, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada
    Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Interdisciplinary Research Center for Smart Mobility and Logistics, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia)

  • Alejandro Vital-Soto

    (Shannon School of Business, Cape Breton University, Sydney, NS B1M 1A2, Canada)

Abstract

Manufacturing industries are undergoing a significant transformation toward Smart Manufacturing (SM) to meet the ever-evolving demands for customized products. A major obstacle in this transition is the integration of Computer-Aided Process Planning (CAPP) with Scheduling. This integration poses challenges because of conflicting objectives that must be balanced, resulting in the Integrated Process Planning and Scheduling problem. In response to these challenges, this research introduces a novel hybridized machine learning optimization approach designed to assign and sequence setups in Dynamic Flexible Job Shop environments via dispatching rule mining, accounting for real-time disruptions such as machine breakdowns. This approach connects CAPP and scheduling by considering setups as dispatching units, ultimately reducing makespan and improving manufacturing flexibility. The problem is modeled as a Dynamic Flexible Job Shop problem. It is tackled through a comprehensive methodology that combines mathematical programming, heuristic techniques, and the creation of a robust dataset capturing priority relationships among setups. Empirical results demonstrate that the proposed model achieves a 42.6% reduction in makespan, improves schedule robustness by 35%, and reduces schedule variability by 27% compared to classical dispatching rules. Additionally, the model achieves an average prediction accuracy of 92% on unseen instances, generating rescheduling decisions within seconds, which confirms its suitability for real-time Smart Manufacturing applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Syeda Marzia & Ahmed Azab & Alejandro Vital-Soto, 2025. "Integrated Process Planning and Scheduling Framework Using an Optimized Rule-Mining Approach for Smart Manufacturing," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-31, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:16:p:2605-:d:1724622
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/16/2605/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/16/2605/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yongkui Liu & Lihui Wang & Xi Vincent Wang & Xun Xu & Lin Zhang, 2019. "Scheduling in cloud manufacturing: state-of-the-art and research challenges," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(15-16), pages 4854-4879, August.
    2. Mohamed Habib Zahmani & Baghdad Atmani, 2021. "Multiple dispatching rules allocation in real time using data mining, genetic algorithms, and simulation," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 175-196, April.
    3. G. N. Nikolov & A. N. Thomsen & A. F. Mikkelstrup & Morten Kristiansen, 2024. "Computer-aided process planning system for laser forming: from CAD to part," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(10), pages 3526-3543, May.
    4. Sungbum Jun & Seokcheon Lee & Hyonho Chun, 2019. "Learning dispatching rules using random forest in flexible job shop scheduling problems," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(10), pages 3290-3310, May.
    5. Barzanji, Ramin & Naderi, Bahman & Begen, Mehmet A., 2020. "Decomposition algorithms for the integrated process planning and scheduling problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    6. Ferreira, Cristiane & Figueira, Gonçalo & Amorim, Pedro, 2022. "Effective and interpretable dispatching rules for dynamic job shops via guided empirical learning," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    7. Olafsson, Sigurdur & Li, Xiaonan, 2010. "Learning effective new single machine dispatching rules from optimal scheduling data," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 118-126, November.
    8. Manuel Parente & Gonçalo Figueira & Pedro Amorim & Alexandra Marques, 2020. "Production scheduling in the context of Industry 4.0: review and trends," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(17), pages 5401-5431, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ferreira, Cristiane & Figueira, Gonçalo & Amorim, Pedro, 2022. "Effective and interpretable dispatching rules for dynamic job shops via guided empirical learning," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    2. Nascimento, Paulo Jorge & Silva, Cristóvão & Antunes, Carlos Henggeler & Moniz, Samuel, 2024. "Optimal decomposition approach for solving large nesting and scheduling problems of additive manufacturing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(1), pages 92-110.
    3. Goli, Alireza, 2024. "Efficient optimization of robust project scheduling for industry 4.0: A hybrid approach based on machine learning and meta-heuristic algorithms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    4. Dong Yang & Qidong Liu & Jia Li & Yongji Jia, 2020. "Multi-Objective Optimization of Service Selection and Scheduling in Cloud Manufacturing Considering Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Wenkang Zhang & Yufan Zheng & Rafiq Ahmad, 2023. "The integrated process planning and scheduling of flexible job-shop-type remanufacturing systems using improved artificial bee colony algorithm," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(7), pages 2963-2988, October.
    6. Moustafa Elnadi & Yasser Omar Abdallah, 2024. "Industry 4.0: critical investigations and synthesis of key findings," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 711-744, June.
    7. Tremblet, David & Thevenin, Simon & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2025. "Constraint learning approaches to improve the approximation of the capacity consumption function in lot-sizing models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 322(2), pages 679-692.
    8. Zhu, Xuedong & Son, Junbo & Zhang, Xi & Wu, Jianguo, 2023. "Constraint programming and logic-based Benders decomposition for the integrated process planning and scheduling problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    9. Verónica Gabriela Valdivia-Plaza & Vianney Judith Robledo-Herrera & Gonzalo Maldonado-Guzmán, 2025. "Lean Production Practices and Industry 4.0 Technologies Integration in Mexican Manufacturing Industry," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 15(6), pages 1-5.
    10. Zhitao Xu & Adel Elomri & Roberto Baldacci & Laoucine Kerbache & Zhenyong Wu, 2024. "Frontiers and trends of supply chain optimization in the age of industry 4.0: an operations research perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 338(2), pages 1359-1401, July.
    11. Hassan Zohali & Bahman Naderi & Vahid Roshanaei, 2022. "Solving the Type-2 Assembly Line Balancing with Setups Using Logic-Based Benders Decomposition," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 315-332, January.
    12. Luo, Zunhao & Wang, Dujuan & Yin, Yunqiang & Ignatius, Joshua & Cheng, T.C.E., 2025. "Service composition and optimal selection in cloud manufacturing under event-dependent distributional uncertainty of manufacturing capabilities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 325(2), pages 281-302.
    13. Lemstra, Mary Anny Moraes Silva & de Mesquita, Marco Aurélio, 2023. "Industry 4.0: a tertiary literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PB).
    14. Rohaninejad, Mohammad & Hanzálek, Zdeněk, 2023. "Multi-level lot-sizing and job shop scheduling with lot-streaming: Reformulation and solution approaches," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    15. A. S. Xanthopoulos & D. E. Koulouriotis, 2018. "Cluster analysis and neural network-based metamodeling of priority rules for dynamic sequencing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 69-91, January.
    16. Kai Li & Fulong Xie & Jianfu Chen & Wei Xiao & Tao Zhou, 2025. "Mathematical models and an effective exact algorithm for unrelated parallel machine scheduling with family setup times and machine cost," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 47(1), pages 129-176, March.
    17. Mohamed Habib Zahmani & Baghdad Atmani, 2021. "Multiple dispatching rules allocation in real time using data mining, genetic algorithms, and simulation," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 175-196, April.
    18. Tian, Jingjing & Jia, Hongfei & Wang, Guanfeng & Huang, Qiuyang & Wu, Ruiyi & Gao, Heyao & Liu, Chao, 2024. "Integrated optimization of charging infrastructure, fleet size and vehicle operation in shared autonomous electric vehicle system considering vehicle-to-grid," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    19. Helga Ingimundardottir & Thomas Philip Runarsson, 2018. "Discovering dispatching rules from data using imitation learning: A case study for the job-shop problem," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 413-428, August.
    20. Yao, Shiqing & Jiang, Zhibin & Li, Na & Zhang, Huai & Geng, Na, 2011. "A multi-objective dynamic scheduling approach using multiple attribute decision making in semiconductor manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 125-133, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:16:p:2605-:d:1724622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.