Author
Listed:
- Lefeng Cheng
(School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)
- Pengrong Huang
(School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)
- Mengya Zhang
(School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)
- Kun Wang
(Institute for Human Rights, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)
- Kuozhen Zhang
(Law School, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China)
- Tao Zou
(School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)
- Wentian Lu
(School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)
Abstract
This paper addresses the challenge of fostering cooperation among virtual power plant (VPP) operators in competitive electricity markets, focusing on the application of evolutionary game theory (EGT) and static reward–punishment mechanisms. This investigation resolves four critical questions: the minimum reward–punishment thresholds triggering stable cooperation, the influence of initial market composition on equilibrium selection, the sufficiency of static versus dynamic mechanisms, and the quantitative mapping between regulatory parameters and market outcomes. The study establishes the mathematical conditions under which static reward–punishment mechanisms transform competitive VPP markets into stable cooperative systems, quantifying efficiency improvements of 15–23% and renewable integration gains of 18–31%. Through rigorous evolutionary game-theoretic analysis, we identify critical parameter thresholds that guarantee cooperation emergence, resolving longstanding market coordination failures documented across multiple jurisdictions. Numerical simulations and sensitivity analysis demonstrate that static reward–punishment systems enhance cooperation, optimize resources, and increase renewable energy utilization. Key findings include: (1) Reward–punishment mechanisms effectively promote cooperation and system performance; (2) A critical region exists where cooperation dominates, enhancing market outcomes; and (3) Parameter adjustments significantly impact VPP performance and market behavior. The theoretical contributions of this research address documented market failures observed across operational VPP implementations. Our findings provide quantitative foundations for regulatory frameworks currently under development in seven national energy markets, including the European Union’s proposed Digital Single Market for Energy and Japan’s emerging VPP aggregation standards. The model’s predictions align with successful cooperation rates achieved by established VPP operators, suggesting practical applicability for scaled implementations. Overall, through evolutionary game-theoretic analysis of 156 VPP implementations, we establish precise conditions under which static mechanisms achieve 85%+ cooperation rates. Based on this, future work could explore dynamic adjustments, uncertainty modeling, and technologies like blockchain to further improve VPP resilience.
Suggested Citation
Lefeng Cheng & Pengrong Huang & Mengya Zhang & Kun Wang & Kuozhen Zhang & Tao Zou & Wentian Lu, 2025.
"Optimizing Virtual Power Plants Cooperation via Evolutionary Game Theory: The Role of Reward–Punishment Mechanisms,"
Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-86, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:15:p:2428-:d:1711722
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:15:p:2428-:d:1711722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.