Author
Listed:
- Heon-Sung Park
(School of Computer Science and Engineering, Chung-Ang University, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea)
- Hyeon-Chang Chu
(School of Computer Science and Engineering, Chung-Ang University, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea)
- Min-Kyung Sung
(Department of Artificial Intelligence, Chung-Ang University, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea)
- Chaewoon Kim
(Department of Artificial Intelligence, Chung-Ang University, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea)
- Jeongwon Lee
(Department of Artificial Intelligence, Chung-Ang University, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea)
- Dae-Won Kim
(School of Computer Science and Engineering, Chung-Ang University, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Jaesung Lee
(Department of Artificial Intelligence, Chung-Ang University, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
Abstract
The goal of on-device continual learning is to enable models to adapt to streaming data without forgetting previously acquired knowledge, even with limited computational resources and memory constraints. Recent research has demonstrated that weighted regularization-based methods are constrained by indirect knowledge preservation and sensitive hyperparameter settings, and dynamic architecture methods are ill-suited for on-device environments due to increased resource consumption as the structure scales. In order to compensate for these limitations, replay-based continuous learning, which maintains a compact structure and stable performance, is gaining attention. The limitations of replay-based continuous learning are (1) the limited amount of historical training data that can be stored due to limited memory capacity, and (2) the computational resources of on-device systems are significantly lower than those of servers or cloud infrastructures. Consequently, designing strategies that balance the preservation of past knowledge with rapid and cost-effective updates of model parameters has become a critical consideration in on-device continual learning. This paper presents an empirical survey of replay-based continual learning studies, considering the nearest class mean classifier with replay-based sparse weight updates as a representative method for validating the feasibility of diverse edge devices. Our empirical comparison of standard benchmarks, including CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and TinyImageNet, deployed on devices such as Jetson Nano and Raspberry Pi, showed that the proposed representative method achieved reasonable accuracy under limited buffer sizes compared with existing replay-based techniques. A significant reduction in training time and resource consumption was observed, thereby supporting the feasibility of replay-based on-device continual learning in practice.
Suggested Citation
Heon-Sung Park & Hyeon-Chang Chu & Min-Kyung Sung & Chaewoon Kim & Jeongwon Lee & Dae-Won Kim & Jaesung Lee, 2025.
"Survey on Replay-Based Continual Learning and Empirical Validation on Feasibility in Diverse Edge Devices Using a Representative Method,"
Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-30, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:14:p:2257-:d:1700285
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:14:p:2257-:d:1700285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.