IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i13p2145-d1691533.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing the Robustness of AI-Generated Text Detectors: A Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Liu

    (School of Computer Science & Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, No. 5, South Street, Zhongguancun, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Yang Li

    (School of Computer Science & Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, No. 5, South Street, Zhongguancun, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Kan Li

    (School of Computer Science & Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, No. 5, South Street, Zhongguancun, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

In recent years, AI-generated text (AIGT) detection has attracted increasing attention, and some detectors demonstrate high accuracy in benchmark settings. However, the complexity and diversity of AIGT and counter-detection methods in real-world applications present substantial challenges for AIGT detection. Consequently, there is a growing demand for more robust AIGT detectors. This survey provides a systematic overview of existing research on enhancing the robustness of AIGT detectors. We categorize the focus of related literature into three key areas: text perturbation robustness, out-of-distribution (OOD) robustness, and AI–human hybrid text (AHT) detection robustness. For each area, we thoroughly summarize and analyze the corresponding robustness enhancement methods and additionally incorporate some approaches from other fields as a supplement. We also methodically organize relevant benchmark datasets, robustness evaluation methods, and metrics used to assess detectors’ performance. Then, through experiments, we evaluate the robustness of several commonly used detectors. Experiments show that text perturbations, OOD text, and AHT all affect the performance of these detectors, revealing that there remains significant room for improvement in their robustness. Finally, we suggest promising future directions based on the current issues faced by AIGT detectors and the detection requirements in real-world scenarios. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review focused specifically on the robustness of AIGT detection.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Liu & Yang Li & Kan Li, 2025. "Enhancing the Robustness of AI-Generated Text Detectors: A Survey," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-29, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:13:p:2145-:d:1691533
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/13/2145/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/13/2145/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:13:p:2145-:d:1691533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.