IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i11p1835-d1668706.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Model Efficiency Analysis Based on Dissimilar Algorithms for Image Learning and Correction as a Means of Fault-Finding

Author

Listed:
  • Joe Benganga

    (Department of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Systems Engineering, Central University of Technology, 20 President Brandt Street, Bloemfontein 9300, Free-State, South Africa)

  • Tshepo Kukuni

    (Department of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Systems Engineering, Central University of Technology, 20 President Brandt Street, Bloemfontein 9300, Free-State, South Africa)

  • Ben Kotze

    (Department of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Systems Engineering, Central University of Technology, 20 President Brandt Street, Bloemfontein 9300, Free-State, South Africa)

  • Lepekola Lenkoe

    (Department of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Systems Engineering, Central University of Technology, 20 President Brandt Street, Bloemfontein 9300, Free-State, South Africa)

Abstract

The introduction of technology in different sectors to optimise efficiency is increasing rapidly. As a result of the opportunities that artificial intelligence presents to different sectors by optimally performing tasks with less error compared to humans or traditional models, the use of AI in artefact detection is being investigated. This research paper thus presents a comparative model efficiency analysis based on dissimilar algorithms, namely CNN, VGG16, Inception_V3, and ResNet_50. The model developed was based on images that were obtained from a Toshiba CT scanner for two types of datasets (88 image datasets) and 170 image datasets, both comprising metal and ring artefacts. Furthermore, the results demonstrate higher data losses in the data transfer learning due to data recycling, suggesting that the model is prone to image feature losses when the model threshold is set at 75%. Additionally, two data transfer models were evaluated against “our model”. The results demonstrate that VGG16 performed better in terms of data accuracy than both the testing and training models, while the Resnet_50 algorithm performed poorly in terms of the loss encountered compared to the other three algorithms.

Suggested Citation

  • Joe Benganga & Tshepo Kukuni & Ben Kotze & Lepekola Lenkoe, 2025. "Comparative Model Efficiency Analysis Based on Dissimilar Algorithms for Image Learning and Correction as a Means of Fault-Finding," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:11:p:1835-:d:1668706
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/11/1835/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/11/1835/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:11:p:1835-:d:1668706. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.