IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i5p669-d1345319.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measurement Studies Utilizing Similarity Evaluation between 3D Surface Topography Measurements

Author

Listed:
  • Lijie Liu

    (Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA)

  • Beiwen Li

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA)

  • Hantang Qin

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA)

  • Qing Li

    (Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
    Center for Nondestructive Evaluation, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA)

Abstract

In the realm of quality assurance, the significance of statistical measurement studies cannot be overstated, particularly when it comes to quantifying the diverse sources of variation in measurement processes. However, the complexity intensifies when addressing 3D topography data. This research introduces an intuitive similarity-based framework tailored for conducting measurement studies on 3D topography data, aiming to precisely quantify distinct sources of variation through the astute application of similarity evaluation techniques. In the proposed framework, we investigate the mean and variance of the similarity between 3D surface topography measurements to reveal the uniformity of the surface topography measurements and statistical reproducibility of the similarity evaluation procedure, respectively. The efficacy of our framework is vividly demonstrated through its application to measurements derived from additive-fabricated specimens. We considered four metal specimens with 20 segmented windows in total. The topography measurements were obtained by three operators using two scanning systems. We find that the repeatability variation of the topography measurements and the reproducibility variation in the measurements induced by operators are relatively smaller compared with the variation in the measurements induced by optical scanners. We also notice that the variation in the surface geometry of different surfaces is much larger in magnitude compared with the repeatability variation in the topography measurements. Our findings are consistent with the physical intuition and previous research. The ensuing experimental studies yield compelling evidence, affirming that our devised methods are adept at providing profound insights into the multifaceted sources of variation inherent in processes utilizing 3D surface topography data. This innovative framework not only showcases its applicability but also underlines its potential to significantly contribute to the field of quality assurance. By offering a systematic approach to measuring and comprehending variation in 3D topography data, it stands poised to become an indispensable tool in diverse quality assurance contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Lijie Liu & Beiwen Li & Hantang Qin & Qing Li, 2024. "Measurement Studies Utilizing Similarity Evaluation between 3D Surface Topography Measurements," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-34, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:5:p:669-:d:1345319
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/5/669/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/5/669/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:5:p:669-:d:1345319. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.