Author
Listed:
- Ernesto Moya-Albor
(Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Panamericana, Augusto Rodin 498, Ciudad de México 03920, Mexico
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Alberto Lopez-Figueroa
(Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Panamericana, Augusto Rodin 498, Ciudad de México 03920, Mexico
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Sebastian Jacome-Herrera
(Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Panamericana, Augusto Rodin 498, Ciudad de México 03920, Mexico
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Diego Renza
(Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, Carrera 11 101-80, Bogota 110111, Colombia
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Jorge Brieva
(Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Panamericana, Augusto Rodin 498, Ciudad de México 03920, Mexico
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
Abstract
At present, the early diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy (DR), a possible complication of diabetes due to elevated glucose concentrations in the blood, is usually performed by specialists using a manual inspection of high-resolution fundus images based on lesion screening, leading to problems such as high work-intensity and accessibility only in specialized health centers. To support the diagnosis of DR, we propose a deep learning-based (DL) DR lesion classification method through a knowledge distillation (KD) strategy. First, we use the pre-trained DL architecture, Inception-v3, as a teacher model to distill the dataset. Then, a student model, also using the Inception-v3 model, is trained on the distilled dataset to match the performance of the teacher model. In addition, a new combination of Kullback–Leibler (KL) divergence and categorical cross-entropy (CCE) loss is used to measure the difference between the teacher and student models. This combined metric encourages the student model to mimic the predictions of the teacher model. Finally, the trained student model is evaluated on a validation dataset to assess its performance and compare it with both the teacher model and another competitive DL model. Experiments are conducted on the two datasets, corresponding to an imbalanced and a balanced dataset. Two baseline models (Inception-v3 and YOLOv8) are evaluated for reference, obtaining a maximum training accuracy of 66.75% and 90.90%, respectively, and a maximum validation accuracy of 35.94% and 81.52%, both for the imbalanced dataset. On the other hand, the proposed DR classification model achieves an average training accuracy of 99.01% and an average validation accuracy of 97.30%, overcoming the baseline models and other state-of-the-art works. Experimental results show that the proposed model achieves competitive results in DR lesion detection and classification tasks, assisting in the early diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
Suggested Citation
Ernesto Moya-Albor & Alberto Lopez-Figueroa & Sebastian Jacome-Herrera & Diego Renza & Jorge Brieva, 2024.
"Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Diabetic Retinopathy Lesions Based on Knowledge Distillation in Fundus Images,"
Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-25, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:16:p:2543-:d:1458323
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:16:p:2543-:d:1458323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.