IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i12p1853-d1414672.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wearable Sensors for Athletic Performance: A Comparison of Discrete and Continuous Feature-Extraction Methods for Prediction Models

Author

Listed:
  • Mark White

    (Applied Sports, Technology, Exercise and Medicine (A-STEM) Research Centre, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK)

  • Beatrice De Lazzari

    (Department of Movement, Human and Health Science, University of Rome “Foro Italico”, 00135 Rome, Italy
    GoSport s.r.l., Via Basento, Lazio, 00198 Rome, Italy
    Interuniversity Centre of Bioengineering of the Human Neuromusculoskeletal System, University of Rome “Foro Italico”, 00135 Rome, Italy)

  • Neil Bezodis

    (Applied Sports, Technology, Exercise and Medicine (A-STEM) Research Centre, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK)

  • Valentina Camomilla

    (Department of Movement, Human and Health Science, University of Rome “Foro Italico”, 00135 Rome, Italy
    Interuniversity Centre of Bioengineering of the Human Neuromusculoskeletal System, University of Rome “Foro Italico”, 00135 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Wearable sensors have become increasingly popular for assessing athletic performance, but the optimal methods for processing and analyzing the data remain unclear. This study investigates the efficacy of discrete and continuous feature-extraction methods, separately and in combination, for modeling countermovement jump performance using wearable sensor data. We demonstrate that continuous features, particularly those derived from Functional Principal Component Analysis, outperform discrete features in terms of model performance, robustness to variations in data distribution and volume, and consistency across different datasets. Our findings underscore the importance of methodological choices, such as signal type, alignment methods, and model selection, in developing accurate and generalizable predictive models. We also highlight the potential pitfalls of relying solely on domain knowledge for feature selection and the benefits of data-driven approaches. Furthermore, we discuss the implications of our findings for the broader field of sports biomechanics and provide practical recommendations for researchers and practitioners aiming to leverage wearable sensor data for athletic performance assessment. Our results contribute to the development of more reliable and widely applicable predictive models, facilitating the use of wearable technology for optimizing training and enhancing athletic outcomes across various sports disciplines.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark White & Beatrice De Lazzari & Neil Bezodis & Valentina Camomilla, 2024. "Wearable Sensors for Athletic Performance: A Comparison of Discrete and Continuous Feature-Extraction Methods for Prediction Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-30, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:12:p:1853-:d:1414672
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/12/1853/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/12/1853/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:12:p:1853-:d:1414672. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.