IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i24p4956-d1300363.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Modeling the Decision Making of Human Operators in Highly Dangerous Situations

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander L. Venger

    (Department of Social Sciences and Humanities, Dubna State University, 141982 Dubna, Russia)

  • Victor M. Dozortsev

    (Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (MIPT), 117303 Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

A prescriptive simulation model of a process operator’s decision making assisted with an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm in a technical system control loop is proposed. Situations fraught with a catastrophic threat that may cause unacceptable damage were analyzed. The operators’ decision making was interpreted in terms of a subjectively admissible probability of disaster and subjectively necessary reliability of its assessment, which reflect the individual psychological aspect of operator’s trust in AI. Four extreme decision-making strategies corresponding to different ratios between the above variables were distinguished. An experiment simulating a process facility, an AI algorithm and operator’s decision making strategy was held. It showed that depending on the properties of a controlled process (its dynamics and the hazard onset’s speed) and the AI algorithm characteristics (Type I and II error rate), each of such strategies or some intermediate strategy may prove to be more beneficial than others. The same approach is applicable to the identification and analysis of sustainability of strategies applied in real-life operating conditions, as well as to the development of a computer simulator to train operators to control hazardous technological processes using AI-generated advice.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander L. Venger & Victor M. Dozortsev, 2023. "Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Modeling the Decision Making of Human Operators in Highly Dangerous Situations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:24:p:4956-:d:1300363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/24/4956/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/24/4956/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:24:p:4956-:d:1300363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.