IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i22p4610-d1278004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aggregation Methods Based on Quality Model Assessment for Federated Learning Applications: Overview and Comparative Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Iuliana Bejenar

    (Department of Automatic Control and Applied Informatics, “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iasi, 700050 Iasi, Romania)

  • Lavinia Ferariu

    (Department of Automatic Control and Applied Informatics, “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iasi, 700050 Iasi, Romania)

  • Carlos Pascal

    (Department of Automatic Control and Applied Informatics, “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iasi, 700050 Iasi, Romania)

  • Constantin-Florin Caruntu

    (Department of Automatic Control and Applied Informatics, “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iasi, 700050 Iasi, Romania)

Abstract

Federated learning (FL) offers the possibility of collaboration between multiple devices while maintaining data confidentiality, as required by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Though FL can keep local data private, it may encounter problems when dealing with non-independent and identically distributed data (non-IID), insufficient local training samples or cyber-attacks. This paper introduces algorithms that can provide a reliable aggregation of the global model by investigating the accuracy of models received from clients. This allows reducing the influence of less confident nodes, who were potentially attacked or unable to perform successful training. The analysis includes the proposed FedAcc and FedAccSize algorithms, together with their new extension based on the Lasso regression, FedLasso. FedAcc and FedAccSize set the confidence in each client based only on local models’ accuracy, while FedLasso exploits additional details related to predictions, like predicted class probabilities, to support a refined aggregation. The ability of the proposed algorithms to protect against intruders or underperforming clients is demonstrated experimentally using testing scenarios involving independent and identically distributed (IID) data as well as non-IID data. The comparison with the established FedAvg and FedAvgM algorithms shows that exploiting the quality of the client models is essential for reliable aggregation, which enables rapid and robust improvement in the global model.

Suggested Citation

  • Iuliana Bejenar & Lavinia Ferariu & Carlos Pascal & Constantin-Florin Caruntu, 2023. "Aggregation Methods Based on Quality Model Assessment for Federated Learning Applications: Overview and Comparative Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-20, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:22:p:4610-:d:1278004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/22/4610/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/22/4610/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhongchang Zhou & Fenggang Sun & Xiangyu Chen & Dongxu Zhang & Tianzhen Han & Peng Lan, 2023. "A Decentralized Federated Learning Based on Node Selection and Knowledge Distillation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-15, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:22:p:4610-:d:1278004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.