IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i19p4038-d1246132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Low-Frequency Electrical Conductivity of Trabecular Bone: Insights from In Silico Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • María José Cervantes

    (Instituto de Física de Líquidos y Sistemas Biológicos, CONICET La Plata, La Plata B1900BTE, Argentina
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Lucas O. Basiuk

    (Instituto de Física de Líquidos y Sistemas Biológicos, CONICET La Plata, La Plata B1900BTE, Argentina
    Grupo de Materiales Granulares, Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, UTN FRLP, La Plata 1900, Argentina
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Ana González-Suárez

    (Translational Medical Device Lab, School of Engineering, University of Galway, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland
    Valencian International University, 46002 Valencia, Spain)

  • C. Manuel Carlevaro

    (Instituto de Física de Líquidos y Sistemas Biológicos, CONICET La Plata, La Plata B1900BTE, Argentina
    Grupo de Materiales Granulares, Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, UTN FRLP, La Plata 1900, Argentina)

  • Ramiro M. Irastorza

    (Instituto de Física de Líquidos y Sistemas Biológicos, CONICET La Plata, La Plata B1900BTE, Argentina
    Grupo de Materiales Granulares, Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, UTN FRLP, La Plata 1900, Argentina)

Abstract

Background: The electrical conductivity of trabecular bone at 100 kHz has recently been reported as a good predictor of bone volume fraction. However, quantifying its relationship with free water (or physiological solution) content and the conductivities of its constituents is still difficult. Methods: In this contribution, in silico models inspired by microCT images of trabecular bovine samples were used to build realistic geometries. The finite element method was applied to solve the electrical problem and to robustly fit the conductivity of the constituents to the literature data. The obtained effective electrical conductivity was compared with the Bruggeman three-medium mixture model using a physiological solution, bone marrow and a bone matrix. Results: The values for the physiological solution plus bone marrow (together as one material) and the bone matrix that best captured the bone volume fraction in the two-medium finite element model were σ p s + b m = 298.4 mS/m and σ b = 21.0 mS/m, respectively. Additionally, relatively good results were obtained with the three-medium Bruggeman mixture model, with σ b m = 103 mS/m, σ b = 21.0 mS/m and σ p s = 1200 mS/m. Simple linear relationships between the proportions of constituents depending on bone volume fraction were tested. Degree of anisotropy and fractal dimension do not show detectable changes in effective conductivity. Conclusions: These results provided some useful findings for simulation purposes. First, a higher value for the electrical conductivity of bone marrow has to be used in order to obtain similar values to those of experimental published data. Second, anisotropy is not detectable with conductivity measurements for small trabecular samples (5 mm cube). Finally, the simulations presented here showed relatively good fitting of the Bruggeman mixture model, which would potentially account for the free water content and could rescale the model for whole-bone electrical simulations.

Suggested Citation

  • María José Cervantes & Lucas O. Basiuk & Ana González-Suárez & C. Manuel Carlevaro & Ramiro M. Irastorza, 2023. "Low-Frequency Electrical Conductivity of Trabecular Bone: Insights from In Silico Modeling," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-13, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:19:p:4038-:d:1246132
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/19/4038/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/19/4038/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:19:p:4038-:d:1246132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.