IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i4p575-d747736.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Performance Measure in Q Learning with UCB Exploration

Author

Listed:
  • Weicheng Ye

    (Credit Suisse Securities, New York, NY 10010-3698, USA
    Most work was done while at Carnegie Mellon University. Opinions expressed in this paper are of the author, and do not reflect the view of Credit Suisse.)

  • Dangxing Chen

    (Zu Chongzhi Center for Mathematics and Computational Sciences, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan 215316, China)

Abstract

Compared to model-based Reinforcement Learning (RL) approaches, model-free RL algorithms, such as Q -learning, require less space and are more expressive, since specifying value functions or policies is more flexible than specifying the model for the environment. This makes model-free algorithms more prevalent in modern deep RL. However, model-based methods can more efficiently extract the information from available data. The Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) bandit can improve the exploration bonuses, and hence increase the data efficiency in the Q -learning framework. The cumulative regret of the Q -learning algorithm with an UCB exploration policy in the episodic Markov Decision Process has recently been explored in the underlying environment of finite state-action space. In this paper, we study the regret bound of the Q -learning algorithm with UCB exploration in the scenario of compact state-action metric space. We present an algorithm that adaptively discretizes the continuous state-action space and iteratively updates Q -values. The algorithm is able to efficiently optimize rewards and minimize cumulative regret.

Suggested Citation

  • Weicheng Ye & Dangxing Chen, 2022. "Analysis of Performance Measure in Q Learning with UCB Exploration," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:4:p:575-:d:747736
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/4/575/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/4/575/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:4:p:575-:d:747736. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.