IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i14p2505-d865967.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

FEM-Based Simulative Study for Multi-Response Optimization of Powder Bed Fusion Process

Author

Listed:
  • Anoop Kumar Sood

    (Department of Manufacturing Engineering, National Institute of Foundry and Forge Technology, Hatia, Ranchi 834003, India)

  • Azhar Equbal

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Jamia Millia Islamia (JMI) University, New Delhi 110025, India)

  • Zahid A. Khan

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Jamia Millia Islamia (JMI) University, New Delhi 110025, India)

  • Irfan Anjum Badruddin

    (Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mohamed Hussien

    (Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, King Khalid University, P.O. Box 9004, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia
    Pesticide Formulation Department, Central Agricultural Pesticide Laboratory, Agricultural Research Center, Dokki, Giza 12618, Egypt)

Abstract

Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) is an additive manufacturing technology which uses a heat source (laser) to sinter or fuse atomized powder particles together. A new layer of powder is spread over the previous layer using a roller, and then the laser power fuses them. This mechanism is repeated until the part model is completed. To reduce the time, effort, and cost, the present study incorporated the design of an experimental approach conjoined with finite element analysis (FEA) to simulate the LPBF process. A three-dimensional (3D) bi-material model was subjected to FEA with variations in temporal and spatial material characteristics. A Gaussian moving heat source model for the multi-scanning of a single layer was developed to understand the effect of process parameters, namely laser power, scan speed, and scan pattern on melt pool dimensions. Although, similar simulation models have been reported in the literature, the majority of these did not consider parametric variations. A few studies adopted multiple parameters which varied simultaneously, but the major limitation of these studies was that most of them did not consider multiple characteristics under a constrained environment. In the present research, the multi-parameter multi-level simulation study was performed to understand the process mechanism with fewer simulations. Results showed that the studied dimensions were sensitive to parameter setting, and that temperature variation within the melt pool was dependant on the material phase in the vicinity of the melt pool. This research proposed that melt pool dimensions must be accurately controlled for optimum process performance to achieve proper overlap between the adjacent scan lines and sufficient depth to complete bonding with the bottom layer. Since the involved criteria were of a conflicting nature, the problem of determining a single factor setting to obtain the desired results was solved using grey relational analysis (GRA). It was found that, among all the considered process parameters, scan velocity was the most significant one. This research recommended a maximum scan velocity i.e., v = 1.5 m/s, with a minimum laser power i.e., P = 80 W. In addition, it was also suggested that low energy density be used to melt the powder layer properly.

Suggested Citation

  • Anoop Kumar Sood & Azhar Equbal & Zahid A. Khan & Irfan Anjum Badruddin & Mohamed Hussien, 2022. "FEM-Based Simulative Study for Multi-Response Optimization of Powder Bed Fusion Process," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(14), pages 1-22, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:14:p:2505-:d:865967
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/14/2505/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/14/2505/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:14:p:2505-:d:865967. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.