IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i13p2345-d855681.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Do Pre-/In-Service Mathematics Teachers Reason for or against the Use of Digital Technology in Teaching?

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Gonscherowski

    (Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Cologne, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, 50923 Köln, Germany)

  • Benjamin Rott

    (Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Cologne, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, 50923 Köln, Germany)

Abstract

The role and the availability of digital technology in society is growing, which is why educators need to increasingly more often decide which types of digital technology to integrate into their teaching and when to integrate them. Thus, those decision-making skills need to be developed and measured especially for pre-service mathematics teachers. Therefore, we conducted an explorative interview study to understand the portfolio of argumentation on whether to use digital technology in different teaching phases and what criteria are used when making those decisions. Our results are based on ten interviews with pre- and in-service mathematics teachers in Germany. The analysis shows that (1) different levels of argumentation can be distinguished and (2) there are indications that teachers need to be aware of digital technology when deciding whether or not to use digital technology in a teaching setting. In addition, (3) besides the teaching-phase perspective and the learner-perspective, we expanded current research by formalizing the educator-perspective in a list of decision criteria. The compiled list of decision criteria was theoretically validated through the literature. In combination with the applied teaching phase framework and taxonomy of digital technology the list could aid in the development of the decision-making skills and potentially could result in a more reflective use of digital technology by pre-service and in-service teachers.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Gonscherowski & Benjamin Rott, 2022. "How Do Pre-/In-Service Mathematics Teachers Reason for or against the Use of Digital Technology in Teaching?," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-23, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:13:p:2345-:d:855681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/13/2345/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/13/2345/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luka Boeskens & Deborah Nusche, 2021. "Not enough hours in the day: Policies that shape teachers’ use of time," OECD Education Working Papers 245, OECD Publishing.
    2. Rushan Ziatdinov & James R. Valles, 2022. "Synthesis of Modeling, Visualization, and Programming in GeoGebra as an Effective Approach for Teaching and Learning STEM Topics," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhiqiang Yuan & Jing Liu & Xi Deng & Tianzi Ding & Tommy Tanu Wijaya, 2023. "Facilitating Conditions as the Biggest Factor Influencing Elementary School Teachers’ Usage Behavior of Dynamic Mathematics Software in China," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Szilárd Svitek & Norbert Annuš & Ferdinánd Filip, 2022. "Math Can Be Visual—Teaching and Understanding Arithmetical Functions through Visualization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-14, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:13:p:2345-:d:855681. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.