IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v9y2025i4p139-d1763088.html

From Chaos to Coherent Structure (Pattern): The Mathematical Architecture of Invisible Time—The Critical Minute Theorem in Ground Handling Operations in an Aircraft Turnaround on the Ground of an Airport

Author

Listed:
  • Cornel Constantin Tuduriu

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University Stefan cel Mare of Suceava, 720229 Suceava, Romania)

  • Dan Laurentiu Milici

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University Stefan cel Mare of Suceava, 720229 Suceava, Romania)

  • Mihaela Paval

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University Stefan cel Mare of Suceava, 720229 Suceava, Romania)

Abstract

Background : In the dynamic world of commercial aviation, the efficient management of ground handling (GH) operations in aircraft turnarounds is an increasingly complex challenge, often perceived as operational chaos. Methods : This paper introduces the “Critical Minute Theorem” (CMT), a novel framework that integrates mathematical architecture principles into the optimization of GH processes. CMT identifies singular temporal thresholds, t k * at which small local disturbances generate nonlinear, system-wide disruptions. Results : By formulating the turnaround as a set of algebraic dependencies and nonlinear differential relations, the case studies demonstrate that delays are not random but structurally determined. The practical contribution of this study lies in showing that early recognition and intervention at these critical minutes significantly reduces propagated delays. Three case analyses are presented: (i) a fueling delay initially causing 9 min of disruption, reduced to 3.7 min after applying CMT-based reordering; (ii) baggage mismatch scenarios where CMT-guided list restructuring eliminates systemic deadlock; and (iii) PRM assistance delays mitigated by up to 12–15 min through anticipatory task reorganization. Conclusions : These results highlight that CMT enables predictive, non-technological control in turnaround operations, repositioning the human analyst as an architect of time capable of restoring structure where the system tends to collapse.

Suggested Citation

  • Cornel Constantin Tuduriu & Dan Laurentiu Milici & Mihaela Paval, 2025. "From Chaos to Coherent Structure (Pattern): The Mathematical Architecture of Invisible Time—The Critical Minute Theorem in Ground Handling Operations in an Aircraft Turnaround on the Ground of an Airport," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-24, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:9:y:2025:i:4:p:139-:d:1763088
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/9/4/139/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/9/4/139/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jane Lee & Lavanya Marla & Alexandre Jacquillat, 2020. "Dynamic Disruption Management in Airline Networks Under Airport Operating Uncertainty," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 973-997, July.
    2. Bojia Ye & Bo Liu & Yong Tian & Lili Wan, 2020. "A Methodology for Predicting Aggregate Flight Departure Delays in Airports Based on Supervised Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Dothang Truong & Mark A. Friend & Hongyun Chen, 2018. "Applications of Business Analytics in Predicting Flight On‐time Performance in a Complex and Dynamic System," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(1), pages 24-52, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zheng, Hongfeng & Wang, Ziming & Zheng, Chuanpan & Wang, Yanjun & Fan, Xiaoliang & Cong, Wei & Hu, Minghua, 2024. "A graph multi-attention network for predicting airport delays," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    2. Ding, Yida & Wandelt, Sebastian & Wu, Guohua & Xu, Yifan & Sun, Xiaoqian, 2023. "Towards efficient airline disruption recovery with reinforcement learning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    3. Rashedi, Navid & Sankey, Nolan & Vaze, Vikrant & Wei, Keji, 2025. "A machine learning approach for solution space reduction in aircraft disruption recovery," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 323(1), pages 297-308.
    4. Erdem, Furkan & Bilgiç, Taner, 2024. "Airline delay propagation: Estimation and modeling in daily operations," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    5. Wandelt, Sebastian & Signori, Andrea & Chang, Shuming & Wang, Shuang & Du, Zhuoming & Sun, Xiaoqian, 2025. "Unleashing the potential of operations research in air transport: A review of applications, methods, and challenges," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    6. Su, Yi & Xie, Kexin & Huang, Lei & Zhang, Xiaoning & Chen, Chutian & Liang, Zhe, 2025. "Aircraft recovery with precancellation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    7. Ahmet Herekoğlu & Özgür Kabak, 2024. "Crew recovery optimization with deep learning and column generation for sustainable airline operation management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(1), pages 399-427, November.
    8. Jiang, Jianlin & Zhang, Sijia & Tang, Yucong & Guo, Yuzhen & Wu, Cheng-Lung, 2025. "ADMM-based augmented Lagrangian methods for robust aircraft recovery problem considering connection time, resource capacity and maintenance flexibility," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    9. Liu, Meiyu & Liu, Naiqi & Gao, Shanshan, 2026. "Enhancing the survivability of a new data-driven robust airline hub network with risk-averse criterion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 266(PA).
    10. Guglielmo Lulli & Amedeo Odoni & Bruno F. Santos, 2020. "Introduction to the Special Section: Air Transportation Systems Planning and Operations Under Uncertainty," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 855-857, July.
    11. Birolini, Sebastian & Jacquillat, Alexandre, 2023. "Day-ahead aircraft routing with data-driven primary delay predictions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(1), pages 379-396.
    12. Andrea S. Patrucco & Tobias Schoenherr & Antonella Moretto, 2023. "The Value of Data‐driven Category Management: A Case for Teaching Data Analytics to Purchasing and Supply Management Students," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(4), pages 427-457, September.
    13. He, Yonghuan & Ma, Hoi-Lam & Park, Woo-Yong & Liu, Shi Qiang & Chung, Sai-Ho, 2023. "Maximizing robustness of aircraft routing with heterogeneous maintenance tasks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    14. Beltman, Maarten & Ribeiro, Marta & de Wilde, Jasper & Sun, Junzi, 2025. "Dynamically forecasting airline departure delay probability distributions for individual flights using supervised learning," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    15. Guo, Zhen & Hao, Mengyan & Yu, Bin & Yao, Baozhen, 2022. "Detecting delay propagation in regional air transport systems using convergent cross mapping and complex network theory," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    16. Ma, Hoi-Lam & Sun, Yige & Chung, Sai-Ho & Chan, Hing Kai, 2022. "Tackling uncertainties in aircraft maintenance routing: A review of emerging technologies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    17. Chandrasekhar Manchiraju & Milind G. Sohoni & Vinayak Deshpande, 2023. "It's not simply luck: The impact of network strategy, schedule padding, and operational improvements on domestic on‐time performance in the US airline industry," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(11), pages 3559-3574, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:9:y:2025:i:4:p:139-:d:1763088. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.