IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v9y2025i3p122-d1739459.html

Port Performance and Its Influence on Vessel Operating Costs and Emissions

Author

Listed:
  • Livia Rauca

    (Faculty for Navigation and Naval Management, Romanian Naval Academy ‘Mircea cel Batran’, 1st Fulgerului Street, 900218 Constanta, Romania)

  • Catalin Popa

    (Faculty for Navigation and Naval Management, Romanian Naval Academy ‘Mircea cel Batran’, 1st Fulgerului Street, 900218 Constanta, Romania)

  • Dinu Atodiresei

    (Faculty for Navigation and Naval Management, Romanian Naval Academy ‘Mircea cel Batran’, 1st Fulgerului Street, 900218 Constanta, Romania)

  • Andra Teodora Nedelcu

    (Faculty for Navigation and Naval Management, Romanian Naval Academy ‘Mircea cel Batran’, 1st Fulgerului Street, 900218 Constanta, Romania)

Abstract

Background : Port congestion contributes significantly to operational inefficiency and environmental impact in maritime logistics. With tightening EU regulations such as the Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) and FuelEU Maritime, understanding and mitigating the economic and environmental effects of vessel delays is increasingly critical. This study focuses on a single bulk cargo pier at Constanta Port (Romania), which has experienced substantial traffic fluctuations since 2021, and examines operational and environmental performance through a queuing-theoretic lens. Methods : The authors have applied an M/G/1/∞/FIFO/∞ queuing model to vessel traffic and service time data from 2021–2023, supplemented by Monte Carlo simulations to capture variability in maneuvering and service durations. Environmental impact was quantified in CO 2 emissions using standard fuel-based emission factors, and a Cold Ironing scenario was modeled to assess potential mitigation benefits. Economic implications were estimated through operational cost modeling and conversion of CO 2 emissions into equivalent EU ETS carbon costs. Results : The analysis revealed high berth utilization rates across all years, with substantial variability in waiting times and queue lengths. Congestion was associated with considerable CO 2 emissions, which, when expressed in monetary terms under prevailing EU ETS prices, represent a significant financial burden. The Cold Ironing scenario demonstrated a substantial reduction in at-berth emissions and corresponding cost savings, underscoring its potential as a viable mitigation strategy. Conclusions : Results confirm that operational congestion at the studied berth imposes substantial environmental and financial burdens. The analysis supports targeted interventions such as Just-In-Time arrivals, optimized berth scheduling, and Cold Ironing adoption. Recommendations are most applicable to single-berth bulk cargo operations; future research should extend the approach to multi-berth configurations and incorporate additional operational constraints for broader generalizability.

Suggested Citation

  • Livia Rauca & Catalin Popa & Dinu Atodiresei & Andra Teodora Nedelcu, 2025. "Port Performance and Its Influence on Vessel Operating Costs and Emissions," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-27, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:9:y:2025:i:3:p:122-:d:1739459
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/9/3/122/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/9/3/122/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ya Xu & Qiushuang Chen & Xiongwen Quan, 2012. "Robust berth scheduling with uncertain vessel delay and handling time," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 192(1), pages 123-140, January.
    2. Zhen, Lu & Zhuge, Dan & Wang, Shuaian & Wang, Kai, 2022. "Integrated berth and yard space allocation under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1-27.
    3. Mehmet Sinan Yıldırım & Metin Mutlu Aydın & Ümit Gökkuş, 2020. "Simulation optimization of the berth allocation in a container terminal with flexible vessel priority management," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(6), pages 833-848, August.
    4. Jeroen Pruyn & Jelle Willeijns, 2022. "Cold ironing: modelling the interdependence of terminals and vessels in their choice of suitable systems," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Guo, Liming & Zheng, Jianfeng & Liang, Jinpeng & Wang, Shuaian, 2023. "Column generation for the multi-port berth allocation problem with port cooperation stability," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 3-28.
    6. Wenhao Peng & Xiwen Bai & Dong Yang & Kum Fai Yuen & Junfeng Wu, 2023. "A deep learning approach for port congestion estimation and prediction," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(7), pages 835-860, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guo, Liming & Zheng, Jianfeng & Du, Jian & Gao, Ziyou & Fagerholt, Kjetil, 2024. "Integrated planning of berth allocation, quay crane assignment and yard assignment in multiple cooperative terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    2. Li, Bokang & Afkhami, Payam & Khayamim, Razieh & Borowska-Stefańska, Marta & Wiśniewski, Szymon & Fathollahi-Fard, Amir M. & Ozkul, Seckin & Dulebenets, Maxim A., 2025. "An intelligent hyperheuristic algorithm for the berth allocation and scheduling problem at marine container terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    3. Yaqiong Lv & Jingwen Wang & Zhongyuan Liu & Mingkai Zou, 2025. "From Heuristics to Multi-Agent Learning: A Survey of Intelligent Scheduling Methods in Port Seaside Operations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-57, August.
    4. Gao, Zhendi & Ji, Mingjun & Kong, Lingrui & Hou, Xinhao, 2024. "Scheduling of automated ore terminal operations based on fixed inflow rhythm," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    5. Haoqi Xie & Daniela Ambrosino, 2025. "Operations Research, Machine Learning, and Integrated Techniques for Decision Problems in the Seaside Area of Container Terminals," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 1-51, June.
    6. Zhu, Waiming & Hu, Xiaoxuan & Pei, Jun & Pardalos, Panos M., 2024. "Minimizing the total travel distance for the locker-based drone delivery: A branch-and-cut-based method," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    7. Shaojian Qu & Xinqi Li & Chang Liu & Xufeng Tang & Zhisheng Peng & Ying Ji, 2023. "Two-Stage Robust Programming Modeling for Continuous Berth Allocation with Uncertain Vessel Arrival Time," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-30, July.
    8. Li, Peng & Dong, Zhixin & Ma, Kai & Yang, Hongjiu, 2025. "IGDT-based coordinated optimization for port berth-logistics-energy scheduling with electricity–hydrogen coupled transport," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    9. Liu, Jingling & Yu, Weiping & Fu, Xiaowen & Liu, Jiaguo, 2026. "Assessing the port resilience under the Red Sea crisis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    10. Jiang, Lijun & Li, Zhi-Chun & Fu, Xiaowen, 2026. "Accessorial value-added services in inland river port: Self-operating or outsourcing?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    11. Ursavas, Evrim & Zhu, Stuart X., 2016. "Optimal policies for the berth allocation problem under stochastic nature," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(2), pages 380-387.
    12. Lyu, Xiaohuan & Lalla-Ruiz, Eduardo & Schulte, Frederik, 2025. "The collaborative berth allocation problem with row-generation algorithms for stable cost allocations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 323(3), pages 888-906.
    13. Huang, Mingzhong & He, Junliang & Yu, Hang & Wang, Yu, 2025. "Stack-based yard template generation in automated container terminals under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    14. Wang, Wenyuan & Liu, Huakun & Tian, Qi & Xia, Zicheng & Liu, Suri & Peng, Yun, 2024. "An enhanced variable neighborhood search method for refrigerated container stacking and relocation problem with duplicate priorities," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    15. Haoqing Wang & Yan Liu & Yuquan Du & Shuaian Wang, 2025. "Optimal refund policy design for ship berthing appointment mechanism," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 347(3), pages 1643-1670, April.
    16. Chen, Rong & Gao, Ge & Kang, Liu-Jiang & Zhang, Li-Ye, 2024. "Efficiency and equity analysis on parking reservation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    17. Hang Yu & Mingzhong Huang & Leijie Zhang & Caimao Tan, 2024. "Yard template generation for automated container terminal based on bay sharing strategy," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 343(3), pages 1157-1175, December.
    18. Berktas, Nihal & Zografos, Konstantinos G., 2025. "Generic model for capacity allocation on transportation terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    19. Gao, Yinping & Zhen, Lu, 2024. "A decision framework for decomposed stowage planning for containers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    20. Raeesi, Ramin & Sahebjamnia, Navid & Mansouri, S. Afshin, 2023. "The synergistic effect of operational research and big data analytics in greening container terminal operations: A review and future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 943-973.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:9:y:2025:i:3:p:122-:d:1739459. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.