Author
Listed:
- Saeed Sadeghi Darvazeh
(School of Engineering and Sciences, Monterrey Institute of Technology, Monterrey 64700, Mexico)
- Farzaneh Mansoori Mooseloo
(School of Engineering and Sciences, Monterrey Institute of Technology, Monterrey 64700, Mexico)
- Andres Acero
(School of Engineering and Sciences, Monterrey Institute of Technology, Monterrey 64700, Mexico)
- Yasel Costa
(Zaragoza Logistics Center, Universidad de Manizales, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)
- Abdoulmohammad Gholamzadeh Chofreh
(Department of Engineering, School of Engineering and the Built Environment, Faculty of Computing, Engineering and the Built Environment, Birmingham City University, Birmingham Birmingham B4 7XG, UK)
Abstract
Background: Supply chains are becoming increasingly complex, interconnected, and stakeholder-intensive, making effective problem formulation as important as identifying optimal solutions. Although problem structuring methods (PSMs) have been widely applied in logistics and supply chain management (LSCM), the literature remains fragmented, providing limited guidance on selecting appropriate methodologies for different problem contexts. Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, this review analyzes 187 journal articles published between 1997 and 2026. Bibliometric analysis and qualitative synthesis were combined to examine the evolution of the field, compare the characteristics and applications of different PSMs, and identify emerging methodological trends. Results: PSM research has grown substantially since 2015, with System Dynamics, Cognitive Mapping, and Scenario Planning emerging as the dominant methodologies. The review also identifies a clear shift toward mixed-methodology approaches that integrate PSMs with optimization, simulation, and multi-criteria decision-making techniques. Stakeholder complexity, uncertainty, and system dynamics were identified as the primary factors influencing methodology selection. Conclusions: This study advances theory and practice by developing an integrated decision-support framework and methodological guidance for selecting appropriate PSMs in complex logistics and supply chain environments. The proposed framework provides a practical roadmap for diagnosing ill-structured problems and choosing suitable problem structuring approaches across diverse supply chain contexts.
Suggested Citation
Saeed Sadeghi Darvazeh & Farzaneh Mansoori Mooseloo & Andres Acero & Yasel Costa & Abdoulmohammad Gholamzadeh Chofreh, 2026.
"Structuring Logistics and Supply Chain Complexity: A Systematic Review of Problem Structuring Methods,"
Logistics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-32, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:10:y:2026:i:7:p:161-:d:1990175
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:10:y:2026:i:7:p:161-:d:1990175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.