IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v10y2026i6p141-d1972393.html

A Fuzzy Decision Model for Evaluating Centralized Purchasing Process Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Nidal Mansouri

    (Mohammedia School of Engineers, University Mohammed V-Agdal, Rabat 10000, Morocco)

  • Aziz Soulhi

    (National Higher School of Mines, Rabat 10000, Morocco)

Abstract

Background : Evaluating centralized purchasing performance is a complex multi-criteria decision-making problem involving uncertainty, linguistic assessments, and subjective judgments from internal clients. Existing approaches provide limited support for handling these characteristics simultaneously. Methods : This study proposes a Mamdani fuzzy inference model integrating four criteria: Service Quality, Responsiveness, Compliance, and Collaboration. The fuzzy rule base was developed using expert knowledge and organizational evaluation practices. The model was applied to a real industrial case study based on an annual evaluation conducted collaboratively by four internal evaluators. Results : The model transformed qualitative assessments into an interpretable performance score while capturing interactions among evaluation criteria and handling uncertainty in the evaluation process. Conclusions : The proposed approach provides a structured decision-support framework for evaluating centralized purchasing performance. It enables the integration of linguistic assessments and expert knowledge, offering a flexible and coherent evaluation tool for industrial environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Nidal Mansouri & Aziz Soulhi, 2026. "A Fuzzy Decision Model for Evaluating Centralized Purchasing Process Performance," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:10:y:2026:i:6:p:141-:d:1972393
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/10/6/141/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/10/6/141/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:10:y:2026:i:6:p:141-:d:1972393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.